data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d44b/4d44bee74ad3e1216a3324da173b5276138821f4" alt="img_box_30_orange"
1629 K Street NW #300
Washington, DC 20006
At Removereports.com, we specialize in managing your online reputation, focusing on removing unwanted Reddit content. With over a decade of experience, our team of experts is equipped to handle even the most challenging content removal tasks. In this guide, we’ll walk you through removing posts from Reddit, including self-service methods and our professional services.
Before diving into removal methods, it’s essential to understand a few key points about post removal on Reddit:
While these methods can be effective for simple cases, they may not address all aspects of content removal, especially for posts that have been shared widely or indexed by search engines.
While the above methods can be effective for removing your posts, there are many situations where you might need more comprehensive or rapid removal services. This is especially true for posts you don’t control, content that has been widely shared, or posts that search engines have indexed. That’s where Removereports.com comes in.
At Removereports.com, we’ve been working on content removals for over a decade. We specialize in removing posts from Reddit and other social media platforms, tackling even the most challenging cases with our proven strategies.
If you urgently need to remove a Reddit post, fill out the form below to receive free, no-obligation quotes within 6 hours.
We understand the urgency of managing your online reputation. That’s why we commit to removing Reddit posts from the internet and deindexing them within 24 hours. Our service goes beyond simply deleting posts – we work on removing the content from search engine results as well, ensuring a more complete removal of unwanted content.
Our team consists of the best experts in online reputation management. We have the skills, tools, and experience to handle complex removal tasks efficiently and effectively.
Whether you’re using our services or managing your Reddit presence on your own, consider these best practices:
When you choose Removereports.com, you can expect:
At Removereports.com, we’re committed to helping you maintain control over your online presence. Whether you need assistance with a single post removal or ongoing reputation management, our team is here to help. Don’t let unwanted Reddit posts affect your online reputation – contact us today to learn how we can assist you in managing your Reddit presence and overall online reputation effectively and efficiently.
Today, people have grudges against people and businesses more than ever. Some would resort to social media to vent their displeasure.
However, for fear of criticism or attack, some would bottle up their pain instead.
Besides this category of people, some are only out to discredit others. Sometimes, the cause of their grievance is unfounded.
Hence, some use specific platforms to hide their identities or communicate their message under an alias.
With the name already screaming anger, you can only find the worst reports and assessments about organizations and people here.
Being a social site, it is open to registration and allows different types of users and reviewers – some true, some false.
More so, be ready to see the worst of reviews here. Nothing flattering about anyone is expected—all pain and disappointment.
If you ever find your business name mentioned on GripeO, you may have a severe issue.
Howbeit, panic no more. We have just curated tested and trusted methods of setting yourself free from its shackles.
The reasons why that could stamp disaster are explained in this article.
If you have tried any previously-recommended solution and did not get a positive result, there is no need to worry.
To delete a Gripeo result, you will need to hire a reputation management company by emailing [email protected]. A removal expert can work with the owners of the gripeO site to delete your review page.
We anticipated that too. Some of our methods are final in operation.
GripeO is a consumer social complaint site that was founded in 2012. Its key owners are Nicholas Campanile and Mark Taylor – with Mark Taylor as CEO. Others are Richard Panek, Jim Proulx, and Stephen Makula.
They created the site in Buffalo, New York, to serve as an online medium for customers to provide feedback for companies and individuals that they had transactions.
The site has an active social media following and increases traffic by over 5% every month.
It has tools for boosting visibility. With it, consumers can increase the visibility of their reports and be sure that they have effectively tarnished an individual’s reputation.
It also has a suite of SaaS tools called ReSolve Social, which businesses can use to resolve the negative feedback from angered consumers.
Do you want to check it out? Does it work? How much do they charge for it? Read on.
Get your content deleted by filling out the below form.
We have a record of excellent service, offer you a lifetime guaranteed service, and only receive complete payment after we have done a satisfactory removal for you.
GripeO claims to have honest, in-depth, accurate, and unbiased reviews.
The posting procedure is found below.
Users have to sign up before they can publish posts on the site.
However, they can navigate and read previous reviews upon reaching the site.
There are different categories of featured posts.
These featured posts include expert reviews, public content analyses, and reports.
These are usually a mix of different classes of material.
Besides the featured posts, there are various categories of reviews.
These may be the section where your company’s review can be found.
Tags on the different reviews within the classes show various degrees of intensity and hatred.
Furthermore, site visitors can also listen to reviews to lighten or intensify the report.
With these, reported companies stand to lose many clients through sites like this, as there is always a means to make any reported incident sound more intense.
Unfortunately, this has put some people out of business. See below how this happens.
The GripeO review removal process is not so different from similar review sites.
Firstly, each time content is posted on GripeO, and the author loses their right over it.
As a result, they would not remove the content or edit it. Thus, content, once posted, remains posted.
Finding the authenticity of the content posted is not a primary issue.
More so, GripeO does not remove content from the site except if it has cause to do so beyond all reasonable doubts.
This implies that only content contravenes the laws set out in its services is removed.
They can modify the content or edit it as they please.
This is usually done when issues are raised on the legibility of content, as mentioned above.
They also owe no one an explanation after they remove content.
Making an effort to verify content posted on the site can be done when there is a complaint and an administration fee is paid.
We shall discuss this later.
They state clearly that authors of posts cannot request their removal after posting.
However, specific causes may lead to content removal after posting it. Check out some of these issues in the listing below:
Copyright issues: The site claims the right to every property posted.
This is because the authors of posts transfer all rights to the content they post to the website perpetually.
This also indemnifies the company of any issues arising from publishing the content.
This rule affects content that exclusively belongs to the post’s author. Such content includes logos, trademarks, software, etc.
If the content belongs to a third party, there is a case for removal.
Provided it belongs to you and not the publisher, you can request its removal. The procedure is shown below.
Inappropriate content:
The site promptly removes content unsuitable for public viewing.
Such content includes pornographic content and content involving the display of children.
Site moderators remove this content immediately after they spot them.
Otherwise, site visitors or affected persons can draw their attention to them.
This type of content does not require any review system, as it can be removed almost instantly.
Insulting content:
The site removes content that has or promotes insulting other persons or using any form of foul language.
If you identify such content used against you, you may flag it to the site administrators to check it out.
They would usually drop some warning points against the author, which could be a step toward getting it down sooner.
Violations:
Report posts that violate posting rules on the site or are spam posts.
Character deformers usually use spamming to heighten the effect of their mission.
The site asks that you submit a report against a violation just once.
If you find any post that keeps coming repeatedly, you must report it as soon as possible.
In so doing, the poster’s account can be tracked, and such posts can be removed.
Howbeit, this does not always guarantee total removal.
Moreover, some people can deliberately create multiple accounts to tarnish the images or businesses of innocent people.
This measure helps to curtail that and similar excesses.
Racism and Threats:
The site admins can remove content that expresses racism and physically threaten others.
These kinds of items are generally unacceptable anywhere.
If you find any offensive content against you on the grounds of racial prejudice, you can draw the attention of the site admins to it, and they will immediately remove it.
Otherwise, the site would be the subject of ongoing litigation.
Personal and private information:
This site does not accommodate content that should otherwise be secret knowledge.
These include personal information (of the author or a third party).
Also, information shared in private conversations is not accommodated on the site.
Hence, you can draw the attention of site admins to it.
The site does not, generally, adapt content that makes people unnecessarily prone to public disturbance.
Such content can cause the victims to suffer from various forms of emotional trauma.
If any review contains your phone number, you can flag it for violation.
If texts shared between you and the post’s author are made public, you can ask for their removal from the site.
These issues are subject to the central legal system and cannot be ignored.
If you ask for their removal, your request will be granted. Anytime.
Necro-posting:
This is the practice of renewing a post by posting comments under it. The site does not accept necro-posting.
Such activities can increase the visibility of outdated content and put the reviewed person or company at risk of a negative public image again.
Besides, it can create a vicious cycle of trouble.
They cause the initial hardships faced by the company after the initial posting to repeat themselves.
Practically, it opens old wounds and checkmates any progress made in the recovery process.
Crunchbase reveals that GripeO has over 46,000 visits every month.
If a tenth of this happens to represent your potential customers, you could imagine the possible damage.
Besides, they have tools that increase their ranking on the internet.
Though they claim to speak the truth, GripeO has no means of verifying the authenticity of information posted on its pages.
This position implies that anyone can lie against you and go free.
Moreover, coming clear from their grip would cost money and may not get you what you want.
Summarily, these could be the implications of a negative review against you on GripeO:
Waste of time:
Unfortunately, this is the fate of many people who have been listed and care about it. It is like an unplanned exercise.
They try to deal with the lousy image both internally and externally.
Sometimes, some company owners get emotionally stressed over the posts. Others stop working for some time.
Still, others begin taking up legal actions immediately.
Wherever you find yourself, if you do care, you will discover that it would result in time wastage.
Loss of clients and potential clients:
Many people rely on the internet to research businesses before doing transactions with them.
Imagine if someone searches for your business online, and the first thing he sees is a negative review about it or a scam stamp.
While some persons may not be perturbed, most users will consider and retreat.
Whether just a client or a handful, this is a loss for many sellers and should be avoided.
Loss of funds:
Loss of clients also implies a reduction in income to the degree to which clients are lost.
More so, going around to make inquiries, hiring an attorney, filing court cases, hiring professionals, etc., costs a ton of money.
These expenses should not be part of the budget and within the provisions of the gaps in the funding.
While GripeO may have its share of difficulties in content removal, it is not impossible to ask for content removal from the site.
If you find content that is unfavorable to you, you can ask for its removal.
It would be best to look for items that violate the site’s terms.
Here we explain how you can make GripeO remove content from their site.
Contact them:
If you find content that mentions you negatively on the site, the first step is to look out for violating information.
If you find one, immediately reach the site admins to remove it.
If your observations or claims are accurate, your request will be granted.
However, if it is not, you stand to waste the effort.
Thus, ensure that you have proof of your claims and know with certainty that your assertions are relevant to the site’s rules.
Convincing a website like GripeO to remove content for you is impossible.
Whether you are a member of the site or not, you need to provide a valid reason for content to be removed because of you.
Contact the post’s author:
Some types of content can only be removed at the original author’s request.
While the site assumes ownership of content after it has been posted, there is room for removing content.
This is possible due to some exceptions regarding content that may not be acceptable, as indicated before.
If, for example, you can reach a truce with the author and the issue is resolved, you may ask them to ask for its removal.
While they may not remove the content immediately, they could down-vote it.
They can also comment against the post stating that the issue has been resolved or a mistake.
Whichever way, the author can have some degree of access to the post wherein they can make an input or two that would weaken its effect.
A copyright method may not be accepted.
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) is a stipulated legal process for initiating the removal of copyright content. The process usually requires that you consult with an attorney.
If you find a copyright infringement on the site, you can contact the site via email – [email protected] and submit the following materials:
This is a legal procedure and would give you a sigh of relief if followed duly.
Notwithstanding, there is another way to go about the content removal process.
Securing the services of an online reputation repair agency might be your best bet to take down content.
Remove Reports is excellent at that.
We have been effective at repairing the reputations of hundreds of companies and individuals and are still doing more.
Usually, some agencies take to the suppression method and find a way around the algorithm.
Some negative brand and individual reviews are removed from sight with suppression, while good content replaces them.
For a site like GripeO, this removal method does not remove the content easily.
The reason is that it has a tool that allows authors and visitors to boost their posts.
Thus, old posts that may have been relegated to the base can resurface after a boost.
In a way, contacting the author is possible. In other cases, it is also possible to sue the author, which should enable you to get paid for defamation.
However, it is impossible to sue GripeO since Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protects it.
Furthermore, initiating a DMCA takedown does not always go smoothly.
We would find ourselves peculiar if the parties fail and defend the other.
In this case, more parties have rights to the content. What happens when a fruitful partnership breaks?
You should contact professionals to remove your name from the site.
You can contact Remove Reports with your details immediately, so our team will engage the relevant personnel to remove your details from the site.
While we would apply some of the abovementioned techniques, we would use a mix of technical skills to make it possible.
More so, we assure you of complete removal and a money-back guarantee as we work on restoring your reputation to heights.
At Remove Reports, we believe that a healthy reputation is a significant factor in attracting the right clients and partners in the market.
Hence, we quickly help our clients return to winning ways with a healthy public view.
GripeO has been offering many consumers a platform to vent their dissatisfaction.
It has also helped potential buyers identify the good and evil in the market before they venture into new stuff.
However, a negative online reputation leads businesses to suffer.
Do not allow that to be your fate. That is why Remove Reports is here – to offer you a ray of hope.
Contact us today and see how the market flows to you.
Scampulse.com has become one of the most potent weapons for those duped by businesses or individuals. It allows users to file their complaints online.
What’s scary is that removing content from ScamPulse is a very tricky affair.
So, if you have been reported on this website, it is likely that you must be fighting negative advertising.
Not only is it painful, but it often results in huge expenses. That, too, without getting you the desired result.
Thankfully, we know a way out.
ScamPulse is an online platform that allows users to post complaints about businesses and individuals.
With a simple interface and high ranking on Google, any content posted on this website will likely reach millions worldwide.
The website enjoys immense trust from its user base with long years of operation.
It is easy to look for complaints against companies arranged in alphabetical order.
One can quickly check the trending complaints on the website’s home page.
Scampulse is a trendy complaint website that could easily ruin one’s reputation.
All one has to do is post on the platform against you.
When trying to get the reports deleted, they became even more prominent on the web.
By closely apprehending the modus operandi of Scampulse.com, we have devised a few approaches that help remove content from this website.
Don’t worry; you do not need to pay us immediately.
We charge the fees after removing the content from Scampulse.com.
With our guaranteed removal services, you do not have to worry about the heavy lifting from your end.
In short, we help you reinstate the online reputation you seek.
Get your content deleted by filling out the below form.
We have a record of excellent service, offer you a lifetime guaranteed service, and only receive payment after we have done a satisfactory removal for you.
Helping you retain your online reputation is what we do.
Although the website strictly prohibits posting untruthful reviews and fake complaints, it seems the warning has done nothing in making ScamPulse.com a completely trustworthy platform.
Now and then, users utilize Scam Pulse to serve their benefits.
Every attempt to save your reputation from these negative online reviews may feel inadequate, but you have a solution.
But, if anyone posts against you on this website, it is inevitable that the word will travel far.
While the one reporting the incident can be completely anonymous, the ones affected have to bear all the shame.
And the losses could be huge. One post can lead to incredible outcomes from your relationship to your career fall.
Negative Advertisement for Brands
Noticeably, most of the complaints listed on this website are by angry customers.
After feeling unsatisfied with the services, some customers often like to talk about it.
Well, that does not mean that the business is always wrong. Sometimes an unreasonable expectation can lead to such anger.
However, it is the business that suffers the most.
These complaints make it difficult for businesses to regain trust by destroying brand recognition.
Challenges in Securing Jobs
Well, there aren’t always complaints that target businesses.
Sometimes customers like a company’s service and product but do not like the ones offering it.
And users end up complaining about the workers of the company.
The brutal truth is that the users reporting against individuals aren’t always right.
Sometimes to take out personal grudges, people post false reports.
But as you would expect, the ball is always in the customer’s court regarding Scampulse.com.
And if employers find it coming in their way of reputation, those being reported on the website could even lose their jobs.
To turn it straight and reasonable, Scampulse.com has strict regulations.
For instance, if the reporting person is an employee of the same company without contact details and not a customer, he could lose the job instead.
However, this is not always easy to track.
Monetary Losses
Businesses often rely on funds to operate. This comes from various external financial institutions.
Any lousy reputation can become a massive barrier for companies seeking loans.
Businesses apply for loans now and then. This can turn into unknown consequences resulting in significant monetary losses.
Figuring out that these posts can be a problem, it is imperative to act fast.
From unavoidable debts to loss in ROI, there could be huge implications one may not foresee beforehand.
And these make it difficult to bounce back.
The process of removing negative posts from Scampulse.com can be hectic sometimes.
There are certain conditions you must meet to request the report takedown.
However, there is no guarantee that the platform will accept your request.
Most of the time, the process of post-removal will depend on the implications.
To understand the scenario in detail, go through the steps below.
Businesses Wanting to Resolve the Problem
Instead, some businesses would like to resolve the problem by directly contacting the post reporter instead of deleting it forever.
In this case, the companies can get the Scampulse.com user to address opinions.
This is the simplest way to choose.
However, remember, the complaint you made earlier would still be online.
But it would reflect that you are responsible enough to address the issues as they come.
Scampulse.com will contact the business reported on its website to make this happen.
In response, you can leave a comment explaining your side of the story as a reply to the complaint.
This would prove you either innocent or responsible for acting against the wrongdoing.
If the post’s author does not reply within a given timeline, the complaint is marked resolved anyway.
Replying faster to the complaints against them, businesses can also avail good ratings on the Scampulse website.
Businesses Wanting to Remove the Report Permanently
If you fall into this category, you have a few ways to make this possible.
However, not every possible method of taking down the report is simple.
Businesses can obtain a court order to take down the content.
Scampulse.com will abide by the court orders. Not doing so will be a breach of the law.
Taking down the report won’t be very difficult if you follow the proper process.
However, there is a catch too. You can check the DMCA procedure for the same on Scampulse’s website.
If the post author challenges the court decision with valid proof, Scampulse will restore the position.
Please note that Scampulse.com never publishes a post without verifying it.
This ensures that inappropriate content does not go live on their platform. For instance, content related to:
If there is any mistake in editing the content by the Scampulse.com team, the affected business or individual can contact the platform for re-verification.
There are cases when the complaints fall under contract misuse.
For instance, if the author has signed a non-disclosure agreement with the business for not disclosing any service information to a third party.
For such cases, the one reporting on the website is held responsible.
Hence, the affected side can ask the author to take down the content.
Once again, you must get a court order by using the author.
Moreover, the author may be asked to pay the cost of damage.
However, you might have to bear the cost of hiring an attorney.
And not everyone can afford one.
Not to mention, the procedure is time-consuming.
Throughout the legal procedure, the negative post will still be online.
Fortunately, we can help remove posts online faster without asking for money immediately.
Businesses Found Guilty
While you still stand a chance to take down false reports or those bound by contracts, sometimes those options aren’t available.
And getting back at Scampulse.com will only bring more trouble. This is when removing reports can help immensely.
Businesses Wanting to Suppress Reports and Not Delete Them
Indeed, users do not look for defamation websites to find information about you. On the contrary, they google it.
And while search engines are intelligent enough to fetch the links with your name, the highly ranked complaint websites often appear on the search result’s first page.
This is when suppression can be helpful.
This pushes the negative posts down to a few pages in search results, never showing off the side you do not want to make prominent.
However, this won’t be effective if someone consistently wants to harm you by creating new harmful content.
But you can always resort to Remove Reports for such problems.
Fortunately, you can still take down the negative posts against you. Just contact Remove Reports to take care of the problem.
We have expertise in getting back our clients’ reputations on track.
We are the fastest resort if you do not want to keep lingering the bitter allegations.
Plus, we won’t charge you any upfront payments. Instead, we would bring the results first. In addition, we personalize our charges as per the case at hand.
So, if the trouble isn’t too foul, we will resolve it for a lesser fee.
Contact us to know exactly how much you must pay to complete the job.
Letmeexpose.is identify and expose the paid PR campaign run by the so-called entrepreneur, business people, and startup geeks.
They did, even if you didn’t see it. The site embraced the advantages of the jet age and became a good business.
The jet age brought its own set of excellent and negative tendencies.
The internet has made it possible for businesses to thrive. According to Internet World Stats, 62% of the world’s population uses the internet. Facebook, Google, and Amazon are just a few of the many internet-based companies that thrive.
This business was able to expand and become a victim of internet fraud. The internet brought in thousands of people and billions, what the bars and casinos had in their hundreds.
Anybody can steal from anyone anywhere in the world. This was the market size.
Letmeexpose.is believed it would be a good business idea to identify these PR suckers and their schemes.
How is it possible for a website created in 2015 to become so popular in such a short period? They have such control and relevance. How can you get rid of their authority?
These questions will help you determine if you or someone you are related to has a profile.
The site will provide you with an overview. We will then help you understand the content removal process.
We can help you if the process proves to be complicated.
Letmeexpose.is exposes an entrepreneur, business people, or startup CEO who uses paid PR to strengthen their online reputation.
It works the same way as other reputation assessment websites by combining the reports submitted to its platform to create an online portfolio. Check out our analysis of related sites.
Letmeexpose.is’s site information shows that the site aims to combat internet fraud. The site welcomes any individuals who wish to report fraudulent or unprofessional actions.
It focuses on businesses. Letmeexpose.com has all kinds of companies, whether they are personal or corporate.
Letmeexpose.com allows you to report individuals, companies, and even phone numbers. It claims to accept both complaints and commendations, but thousands of complaints of all kinds fill the site.
Companies – The website helps its users avoid being victims of fraud by trusting online PR. It encourages users to report these organizations on the site. They can also learn how to resolve issues falling prey to scams.
This website is a big target for companies and individuals.
How else would we explain dig-into-reputations? Whose reputation demands digging?
The website might be able to prove that it does indeed intend to combat scams.
And they claims that it intends to target organizations that have worked hard to improve their reputations.
This is, however, not the truth.
Most of the onsite reviews are negative.
This does not mean that the company is lower than 50 percent. Letmeexpose.is is still associated with negative reviews.
The site has few positive intentions.
Individuals: Systems and individuals make up organizations. Letmeexpose.is targets both. Users can report any inappropriate conduct by an employee to Letmeexpose.is.
They are effectively portrayed negatively and the organization as a whole. It could also lead to them losing the job to save its reputation.
Phone numbers Letmeexpose.is highlights telephone numbers associated with individuals or organizations. Searching for a number will reveal the details of the person who registered it.
Letmeexpose.is’s spam call filter prevents unsolicited calls from increasing. This measure is impressive, but it only encourages the growth of such numbers.
Want to delete your report from letmeexpose.is? Fill out the form below to get no-obligation quotes within 6 hours.
Letmeexpose.is offers information about how users can leave reviews on its Terms and Service page.
It summarizes the following:
Letmeexpose.is’s complaint filing process is very similar to other sites. Letmeexpose allows users to submit reviews significantly different from other sites.
The review process creates endless company profiles, individual names, and phone numbers. Site users would find them easily, learn about them and submit reviews.
Letmeexpose does not promote positive reviews, contrary to what it claims. This is the main reason for the many negative reviews.
When submitting a review, users must enter the company’s details or the individual they report. Letmeexpose allows you to view complete profiles of companies that have been reported.
Information submitted would include names, addresses, telephone numbers, and emails. Subsequent submissions for the same person or company do not require you to type these details.
Instead, the reporter can enter some letters starting with the name to locate them and add them to the thread.
The reporter must add his email address to the report to receive notifications on his thread. If a victim has any questions, they can reach out to the reporter.
Read More: How To Remove Content From GripeO.com
Yes. It does provide valuable tips on how to avoid scams. They also offer helpful tips for identifying them. It also shows how victims can quickly recover from scams.
Letmeexpose is living up to its potential. The most valuable part of the website might be its complaint submission page.
Although the page is impressive, it does not fail to highlight the importance of filing a complaint about poor service.
The site does not attempt to encourage users to leave positive reviews.
Let me expose is the best place to find out about a company or person.
We are experts in minimizing the complications of complex systems such as these.
Yes and no.
Because of the almost 20,000 unique visitors to the site each day and the nearly 70,000 page views daily.
This information should be enough to make you believe your next client has visited the site. They will if they haven’t already. Soon.
Let me expose was established in 2015. It has since grown exponentially to be a respected authority in the review market. It is now a reputable brand that has surpassed BBB.org and Yelp in a matter of months.
ComplaintsBoard.com has a strong following despite its poor reviews. See our article.
If you have to, you need to understand that reviews still influence the buying decisions of buyers today.
Businesses are popping up everywhere, and not just from the suburbs. Customers become even more confused when they are confused about where to go. A review can help you decide.
Yes. Reviews can be very confusing. We can’t tell you more.
However, we can tell you that more than 90% of young customers trust reviews. Additionally, over 80% of online searches are directed towards negative thoughts.
Although this number is proportional to how many reviews there are, a negative review can quickly identify an individual or organization with negative tags (according to Search Engine Journal).
We thought it was worth mentioning that reviews are more popular than adverts. About 75% of people avoid adverts on average. If you don’t know what this means, you should reread the entire article.
You may, however, choose not to take a Let Me Expose Review seriously. Why? It may not matter what it does to you.
We would have been pleased to support your confidence.
This would be a dishonest act of deceit. We have seen the many consequences of negative content removal systems through our years of experience.
Negative reviews or a mention on this kind of website are red flags. You might want to consider an alternative option to your current one if you don’t decide to accept it. If you already have one, this measure will pay off.
No matter which option you choose for a listing – Remove Reports is your best friend in that.
Professional records of success in helping individuals and businesses get off harmful reviewing websites such as Letmeexpose.com are proof of our professionalism. Let’s not let that stop us. The rest will be up to experience.
Read More: How To Delete Content From ScamPulse.com
Letmeexpose.com is a site you should avoid if you have received poor reviews online. Worse, if you don’t know the facts or circumstances that led to the review, it is a reason to be afraid. Honestly!
The reviews seem to be uninvited, to put it mildly. They appear to come out of nowhere and are constantly changing. They are not yours to control.
It is not clear if they are doing it to investigate fraud or profit from business owners.
We can assure you that you will not appear on Letmeexpose. It will never happen to you. Never. Even to a healthy competitor.
These implications include:
Scam tag – For or against, any mention of Letmeexpose.com could as well be considered a scam. Letmeexpose.com has revealed that it is against businesses cheating customers and taking advantage of them.
If this were true, people would be trying to vent their frustrations against employees or companies with poor practices.
Letmeexpose.com is easily referred to as a site for scammers, with more than 70% of the comments being negative.
You cannot afford not to be there, for good or evil. You can still go if you have an excellent site review that exceeds 80%.
If you are unable to remove it, contact Remove Reports immediately.
It is essential to realize that any business or person associated with fraud today will likely lose its market. This is something that you shouldn’t allow in your industry.
TIP: We created an informative article for a site similar to Scamion.com Removal.
Potential and present customers can be lost by one negative review. With just four reviews, this could lead to customer losses of over 70%.
Understanding the implications of such changes for your business will help you determine how to best direct your efforts.
Unfortunately, some information spreads faster than you might think because of customer networking. No matter your opinion or confirmation, stories and reviews will grow.
Clients will not contact you every time to justify themselves. They probably won’t trust you enough not to give you this window of opportunity, except that they trust you completely.
Loss in revenue: This happens as a result of losing patronage. Losing clients can also mean losing money. Your income streams become severely affected. Your income patterns are changing.
Orders seem sparse.
An entrepreneur or business without any revenue is likely to be in liquidation. This could be the reason you receive a negative review of your business.
Customers may not be aware of the consequences if they use these sites to vent their frustration.
Negative reviews can sometimes be rewritten. This limitation is explained in our article RipOffReport.com.
Loss in the capital: This list is incomplete without understanding the implications of a financial review.
It will be evident that you wonder why businesses do this. Just the thought of more companies depending on loans can be enough to make you fear for your business’s future. How can one handle it?
Negative reviews can have far more significant consequences than traffic loss, given the revenue loss and clients lost data. Businesses will not be able to repay loans on time.
This could lead to higher interest rates, increased debt, and even court action.
Forbes found that nearly 95% of customers stayed away from businesses due to negative reviews. It is best to immediately remove any negative reviews from this website if you can decode the meaning.
A review of you would be available for any query on any search engine, whether it is true or false. Your client doesn’t necessarily need to know about Letmeexpose.com.
It’s so unfortunate! Your ranking advantage in search engines could make you appear on the first page. Worse, your review might be the first result of a search for your name.
You can take appropriate steps to stop it from happening to you.
Remove Reports are great at removing information from sites such as Let me expose.
We would be happy to share with you some methods you can use.
You can use each method if you meet the requirements. Letmeexpose does not have all the right content. It is possible that some unscrupulous people could misuse it.
We have provided steps to help you safely perform a takedown and help you if the steps seem difficult. We can also assist you if you prefer us to continue the process. A similar example is available with our recommendations.
If you don’t have enough material to perform a takedown, Remove Reports may help you.
Let’s see how we can do this.
Secure a court order
You can sue the author if they publish inappropriate content.
You would be unable to use that website if they allow harmful content. The Communications and Decency Act makes this provision.
This limitation means that it is best to get a legal order from the website to remove the content.
Its clearly states in its pages that they won’t allow any inappropriate content to remain on the site. The site admits that it does not verify the authenticity of any information.
The author of the content is responsible for any consequences.
Before you can use a court order to obtain it, you must first determine the nature of the content. Photos of naked persons, photos of children, security and financial information, among others, are all examples of inappropriate content.
If the material complies with the requirements, you can ask for a subpoena from a court. The website admin provides its contact for collecting subpoenas – [email protected].
The court will approve the request, and the person can get the subpoena. The website will comply with subpoenas.
This feature is available to individuals and businesses who find inappropriate content in their Letmeexpose.is profile.
It is possible to pin one person, but it might not be necessary because it works automatically and relies on reviews and reports.
However, if you find defamatory content, you may sue the author.
Authors’ emails will be collected during the posting process. The author can be arrested and sued unless they are ghostwriters. This is not allowed by Letmeexpose.
Letmeexpose will provide all the details for the author if the order is served.
Read More: How To Get Yourself Removed From Complaintsboard.com
The website allows you to remove copyright-protected information. This is possible thanks to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
They will take down any intellectual content you find or similar content to which you have exclusive rights.
You will need to send a notification to the contact email (provided above) to make this possible. This is the notification:
The website will confirm the removal of the content.
According to the DMCA, the author may protest the takedown and submit a counter-notification. The website admin can restore the content if the original claimant fails to respond within 10-14 days.
The website notification system allows reporters to be notified whenever there is activity on their site. This can help make the DMCA process more difficult.
This ensures that the victim can still have the opportunity to complain about the author. They would know immediately if someone else has submitted counter-content.
Persons or organizations can use the DMCA provisions with content they don’t authorize to be published elsewhere.
What about those who do not have these rights? Remove Reports can help you too.
Contact us if you believe you accidentally uploaded your content. We can also help you if you are innocent of any complaints but don’t have the required materials to support your claim.
No matter your condition, Remove Reports can help you.
We can also assist you in ensuring that Google doesn’t display your URL on any page that contains harmful content.
Read More: How To Get Yourself Removed From Scamion.com
Maintain a safe online reputation
It is challenging to have an excellent online reputation. Customers and competitors may be up to different schemes. Sites like this may be a perfect way to let out their anger, but they might not understand the consequences.
To avoid any complications, we recommend that you conduct an online reputation check at least twice per week. It may not be enough to satisfy the requirement.
You can still have 100% online reputation security.
Contact Remove Reports if you need professionals to monitor and manage your online reputation.
We offer the best services.
Many websites claim to warn people about the lousy businesses and cheaters in a relationship.
One such website which has a high google ranking is ComplaintsBase.com.
It lets users post about the individuals who are not safe to date or have had a previous history of misusing their dates for their gains.
ComplaintsBase.com can be easily accessed even by those with basic knowledge about the internet and computers.
Hence, anyone can write about anyone without much of a hassle.
On top of that, the reports made can be anonymous. In this case, the individual will never know who posted the statement.
Because of these concerns, many times, a poster himself reports about genuine people with fake complaints.
And, it is impossible to identify which report is fake and which one has got grounds.
Hence, 99% of the users consider all the complaints as truthful for avoiding any problems later on.
So, if you are on Complaints Base, it is no brainer that you would be entitled to lousy business, whatever the truth may be.
And, once it happens, your social network will be compromised for no good.
You will have to handle pressure at the office and other professional setups.
There have been cases where individuals were blackmailed with these reports.
Hence, before the problem becomes non-rectifiable, it is wise to ask for assistance.
Although there are many ways to fight the situation, very few will provide the expected results in less amount of time.
If you are looking to remove these reports on ComplaintsBase.com right away, contact Remove Reports.
Our team focuses on providing an apt solution for problems related to online reputation management.
You can trust us without a cloud of doubt.
We have been dealing with such complaints for a long time and understand the various nuances connected with this problem.
With more than 200 websites under our perimeter, we can provide the solution in less than 24 hours.
The complaints will go away within a day from ComplaintsBase.com.
On top of that, you only pay after the results are achieved.
We do not ask for colossal retainer fees, and the charges are well discussed before proceeding with the required solution.
You will never have to face the hidden cost.
We consider our job responsibly and aim to gain our clients’ trust before anything else.
To get fast access to our services, fill up the contact us form ASAP.
When trying to get the reports deleted, they became even more prominent on the web.
Get your content deleted by filling out the below form.
We have a record of excellent service, offer you a lifetime guaranteed service, and only receive payment after we have done a satisfactory removal for you.
If complaints about your business have been listed on Ripoff Report, you know how frustrating it is.
But with a savvy online reputation management team, there are ways to get around this problem.
That is, to get the listing removed from Google’s search reports.
But this strategy doesn’t completely get rid of the Ripoff Report listing.
Instead, it only keeps web searchers from discovering it, which is the most critical part.
To give you a heads up, Ripoff Report is a consumer complaint website where any user can post a report about a business entity or person.
The only thing the website requires to assure truthfulness is a valid email address and verification from the author via mouse click.
Once a review is posted, the Ripoff report could be there forever.
To make things worse, Ripoff Reports have the odd ability to rank extremely high in search engines, especially Google.
Even if the parties involved finally resolve their differences, this platform doesn’t remove the original complaint.
Ripoff Report is protected from liability under a federal law known as the Communications Decency Act.
This law states that websites should not be held responsible for the content posted by third parties.
For example, if a user posts a negative comment on another person, legal liabilities will be imposed on the forum owner, and there will be no forums.
Even if the original author of the harmful content requests its removal or a court order declares the report defamatory.
This can be frustrating to business owners, especially when both parties have already agreed to request the removal of the content.
But Ripoff Report argues that if they allow parties to remove the post, it could create a means for big companies to bully consumers into silence and submission.
As expected, negative online reviews could have a devastating effect on your brand.
A 3.3-star rating is a minimum a business should earn for consumers to engage with them. A negligible 13% of consumers will consider using a one- or two-star rating company.
Ninety-four percent of consumers say that online reviews convince them to avoid a business altogether.
Four out of five consumers change their minds after reading negative online reviews.
A business can risk losing as much as 22% of customers with just one negative article; if three negative pieces turn up in a search query, the possibility of losing customers increases by up to 59.2%.
Even if you have a star rating for your company, negative changes can severely impact.
Consider this scenario: a loss of a half-star rating means a restaurant is 19% less likely to have total seats during peak times.
At the same time, a one-star decrease in Yelp ratings could result in a 5% to 9% decrease in profits.
People have taken the following routes to repair these damaging listings:
If the complaint holds water, it is best to do it right. Offer to the right your wrong. Express your regret and apologize to the customer.
It is always best to iron out these issues before they become an online reputation management problem.
Once you smoothen things out, you can ask the poster to edit the report.
Sadly, even if the customer agrees, you will encounter another hitch. The author has no power to edit or delete the review.
Moreover, even if the consumer adds a follow-up to the review, you run the risk of the report showing up on Google and Bing by keeping it active.
Another risk is that the customer could paint you negatively by sharing your attempts to edit or delete their listing on Ripoff Report.
A rebuttal will show up beneath the original report.
It does not change the negative comment that appears in the original listing.
It could worsen by providing more content to be indexed by search engines.
But if you do post a rebuttal, a tip is to avoid using any names or words that would give the search engines keyword terms to find.
For example, instead of saying Jacob’s Furniture try using “the company mentioned above.”
Ripoff Report will investigate the adverse reports about you and post their findings above the original message.
Even if the offending statements are valid, the Ripoff Report will state you have resolved the issue and committed to 100% customer satisfaction.
Although the original report remains on the Internet, the positive content will appear above the negative information.
But this doesn’t change the fact that you are still on the Ripoff Report website, which can be damaging in itself.
But interestingly, Ripoff Report now has a VIP arbitration program.
It allows you to pay a certain fee to an arbitrator and then challenge the validity of the reports against you.
If the arbitrator favors you, Ripoff Report cleans up the untruthful statements.
The VIP arbitration program is less costly than the Corporate Advocacy Program.
But in either case, you will be paying the company that published the negative comment about you in the first place.
Not many people take this route. In many cases, the original author does not have the financial resources to pay for monetary judgment that might be issued.
Moreover, Ripoff Report does not allow the original author to remove the offending report anyway.
Therefore, getting a court order to remove the information is of little value.
Reputation management firms, at their core, are PR or SEO consultants.
They will devote countless hours to rebuilding your reputation by creating positive reviews, articles, and other media to drive off the offending Ripoff Report on the first page of Google search results.
In many cases, these undertakings are successful.
But in a few others, Ripoff Reports are too strong to be pushed down completely, and the damage it causes continues.
Since SEO efforts are an ongoing effort, success is only temporary.
A majority of lawsuits against this platform have had very little success.
As mentioned, Ripoff Report enjoys immunity under the Communications Decency Act.
Ripoff Report believes it is immune from liability and fights all lawsuits against them, making this route the costliest and least effective.
No lawyer is going to handle this case on a contingency fee. You could be spending tens of thousands on attorney’s fees.
The best route is to get rid of Ripoff Report results by burying them in Google’s bottommost pages.
It is also the most ethical strategy to reinstate your good name and put you on the road to maintaining a healthy reputation online for years to come.
A reputation management team is dedicated to generating original content in various media from articles, social media profiles, and websites.
These firms are also SEO experts who can help you interlink and optimize your content to sanitize your online reputation and maintain it.
This approach means outranking Ripoff Report, so they stay off the first page of search engine results about you.
This is a massive undertaking that can take months and even years. While it may require consistent upkeep, results are worth the time and effort.
Once the Ripoff Report is eliminated from first page rankings, your business will enjoy the benefits of a solid online presence teeming with unique positive content.
Business owners will be involved in every step of the process.
You will know exactly where things are in contrast to placing this issue entirely in the hands of the court of law.
How successfully you can push down a Ripoff Report will depend on many factors. First, ask yourself the following questions:
If you have a famous name or share a character with a celebrity or prominent person, it will be tricky to create a personal brand that can outrank every other search result.
However, this strategy may work positively for you when dealing with a Ripoff Report. Other search results may push away this negative result.
Moreover, if you have a unique name and there aren’t many posts about you, there’s a good chance that professional profiles and personal websites that you create and optimize for your name will reap high rankings.
Remember that when it comes to tackling a Ripoff Report, the information already posted online about you, your brand, or your business can either help or harm you.
Therefore, if you have tons of positive press from reputable and authoritative websites or are already using a Twitter and Medium account, a Ripoff Report won’t be all that damaging.
People searching for you will see more aspects of who you are rather than one opinion shared on the Ripoff Report.
But if there is little information about you, to begin with, that Ripoff Report will not have anything to compete with and will rank well and reasonably quickly.
In terms of the time of the complaint, Google and other search engines favor very old and very new search results.
So, whether this report is from last week or five years ago, it may have some authority from the search engine’s perspective.
In addition to those mentioned above, other factors can make Ripoff Reports challenging.
While Ripoff Reports can be challenging to bury, it is not impossible.
Do you wish to remove content from RipOffReport.com urgently? We have got a solution to get it removed from Google quickly.
Get in touch with us by filing out the below form
By consistently optimizing and publishing premium content online, you stand the best chance of surpassing the negativity associated with a negative report on this platform.
You need to uplift your brand with positive content to suppress negative results. This undertaking is done via reputation management and SEO strategies combined. But what is the difference?
Search engine optimization (SEO) is focused on ranking a domain for different keywords. In contrast, online reputation management (ORM) ranks many other websites for a small selection of branded keywords.
In other words, ORM utilizes SEO tactics to influence and shape brand sentiment by directing the overarching narrative of your search engine results.
But this effort is not all about fixing reputations.
ORM also enables brands to monitor their SERPs for risks, protect against future incidents, and analyze reputational perils.
Like SEO, you cannot achieve long-term results without quality.
If your business has issues with its reputation, the undertaking needed to rebuild your reputation can be overwhelming. You need to invest your entire time and effort in this undertaking.
Moreover, this task is something you should entrust to a high-quality and seasoned firm.
Brands that collaborate with online reputation management firms with proven results are likely to recover from a crisis quickly.
Regardless of dealing with unfair comparison sites, negative Yelp reviews, unmanaged social media profiles, glass door review complaints, or never-ending viral news, a premium ORM is a non-negotiable to reinstating your positive online impression.
Your only valid option to pushing down bad reviews and news articles from Google is to compete with negative research results via ORM. This tactic involves several strategies, and each provides a critical piece to answer the online reputation riddle.
The first critical step to burying the negative search result is to develop a strategy for your reputation management. You must hire a team of professionals across several disciplines to comb your search engine results for weak spots and opportunities.
But this route requires a massive investment of resources to discover critical areas for growth while also honing in on negative search results and pushing them to the bottom of SERPs.
This strategy will involve SEO analysts, digital marketing strategists, content editors, backlink specialists, and project managers.
In some cases, digital marketing strategies ignore ORM when optimizing domain names and web pages. A majority of businesses are more concerned about non-branded SEO than reputation.
Although these two have many things in common, several key differences when optimizing a website to rank for branded search. The following are factors you need to consider:
Every business will need multiple web properties to effectively drive down negative search results and uplift positive brand awareness.
It takes more than one website and a Twitter account to push down negative search results.
Owning the content on these websites also guarantees that everything about your business will be favorable and encourage positive ideas among your customers.
Some examples of satellite website ideas are the following:
Many CEOs are extremely busy and never have the time or resources to manage multiple social media accounts.
From Facebook to Instagram to LinkedIn, monitoring every profile for optimum user engagement can take hours.
But social media accounts are critical for resolving your reputation management issues.
You must claim and optimize your profiles. Actively post and connect with customers and other thought leaders in your field.
Google’s algorithm regularly crawls the Internet to search for fresh content to satisfy searchers’ needs.
Afterward, the search engine indexes and categorizes the content according to entities and topics.
The more content Google finds around a particular case, the more likely it will judge the subject as relevant. As a result, Google will continue to deliver that content.
Your best defense is to roll out highly targeted optimized content to change the narrative in your favor.
But this is not as easy as it looks. One mistake could unintentionally put you on the wrong side, making it harder to push down negative search results.
The optimization of press releases is another critical reputation management strategy.
Knowing the type of content that is newsworthy and promotable is a specialized skill. This is especially the case when crafting press releases after a crisis.
You must also make sure that your press releases are optimized for your brand to rank high on Google.
The final step to suppressing negative search results will involve scouring through the search engine topography for all opportunities to promote your company or brand.
An online reputation management firm will map out positions when building an ORM strategy for you. Content may include the following:
Because new sites and content continue to turn up in SERPs, reputation management is an ongoing process that requires an eagle eye.
You will need a seasoned SEO strategist to conduct the necessary search.
Consumers scour through online reviews before purchasing a product or service in the digital era.
Online reviews and websites that enable customers to post reviews have become a crucial part of the digital landscape over the past decade.
Third-party review sites are some of the first resources consumers look for when researching businesses of their interest.
For this reason, one negative article on the Ripoff Report can shut you down.
Adverse reports and ratings on platforms run by third parties have the effect of driving customers away.
Tons of studies have demonstrated that business reviews, whether positive or negative, are valued much more than recommendations from friends and family members.
Positive reviews also enable you to enhance your online reputation and serve as an extension of your PR strategy.
Small businesses often rely on their digital presence to generate business, especially if limited advertising budgets.
But negative reviews such as negative Ripoff Report reviews that have received much attention produce the opposite effect.
When negative ratings pop up on sites like these, your online reputation can become damaged.
Even one bad review can reduce as much as 9% revenue in a year.
ComplaintsBoard.com might be the most authoritative website for reporting businesses and individuals on the Internet.
It also maintains correspondence with a similar number of persons.
While many other complaints sites have minimal provisions for reported persons to remove their names, ComplaintsBoard.com provides you with more.
We would not tell you how difficult it is to remove your content. (You must have known that already).
However, we will guide you through the modus operandi of ComplaintsBoard.com.
We hope you will identify your scenario and ask them to remove your content.
If it turns out that you need assistance going about the content removal process, you need to contact Remove Reports to offer you professional services.
Our team of removal experts can be engaged to help you harness the provisions of the Complaints Board.
If it turns out that you cannot ultimately benefit from the provisions of ComplaintsBoard.com, we can also help you remove your name.
Get your content deleted by filling out the below form.
We have a record of excellent service, offering you a lifetime guarantee to remove the complaint. You are not required to pay any money upfront; we only charge your card after removing the complaint from complaintsboard.com.
Helping you retain your online reputation is what we do.
ComplaintsBoard.com is an online board for submitting complaints against organizations and individuals. It highlights unprofessionalism.
The site has been around for years and has a strong history of patronage from clients worldwide – especially in the US.
The owners exclusively designed ComplaintsBoard.com to accommodate complaints about diverse categories of organizations and individuals, as shown on its site.
This classical arrangement ensures that the reporter can post against any organization or individual (or offense).
It also categorizes the reported persons by their given locations. Effectively rules out any doubts about the complaint.
ComplaintsBoard.com, according to its explanations, aims for better professional practices in using its platform.
It states that users should not post lies on its platforms. Though it creates a window for reviewing content before posting it, ComplaintsBoard.com does not verify the truth.
If the reviewing processes go on successfully, the affected party loses much. Find a possible listing below.
Read More: How To Remove Content From GripeO.com
The loss of patronage is not the first time we have told you that a listing on an online reporting site like ComplaintsBoard.com could affect your business in many ways.
The broad reach and authority of ComplaintsBoard.com ensure that a listing of your business reaches many. Search engines quickly crawl any report here for all and sundry before you know it.
Many of the submissions made on the website are by offended customers to the disadvantage of business owners and employees.
It has led to the continual loss of business patronage among many businesses.
Though unfavorable for many businesses, this approach has put many on their toes and effectively made them apply best practices.
Large amounts of reports on ComplaintsBoard.com are against the poor services of some workers. Offended and malicious alike customers take advantage of this platform to report them.
If taken seriously by their employers, the employees could lose their jobs. Employers often take this step to save their businesses.
The employees become the victims in this sense.
As we will show later, ComplaintsBoard.com contacts reported organizations to reach an agreement on resolving the reports.
If the reported party turns out to be an employee without contact information, they stand to lose their job.
Alternatively, ComplaintsBoard.com can reach the organization directly regarding its employee. The reason that the employee was cause for the organization’s mention on the Internet is enough reason for a sack. It can spell doom for the employee.
ComplaintsBoard.com reveals that it searches the Internet for the contact information of organizations and individuals mentioned on its site. It contacts them directly before they even know about it.
A negative review online can cause a long chain of consequences in a world where businesses are run with loans.
In a country like the US, where businesses apply for as much as $600 billion on loans yearly, a business decline is not something one can afford.
A negative portrayal of a business would not only cause a loss of possible profit but also throw one into avoidable debt.
This seems like a valid question. The answer: Yes, and No.
Yes, because it makes business owners and other persons understand the need to be upright in their business practices.
A look at the preview pane of ComplaintsBoard.com would show that many persons have benefitted from it.
Are their claims true or false? Looking at external sites like Trustpilot and Sitejabber will show if those reviews are anything to go by.
No, because the site has caused losses to businesses.
The authority that ComplaintsBoard.com wields is enormous. It has been beneficial to some extent, we could say. However, the negative impact it causes outweighs its benefits to a large degree.
This is why you should not delay getting your name off ComplaintsBoard.com as soon as possible.
We can show you how to go about the options that ComplaintsBoard.com offers you. In addition, we can also be open to helping you through this.
The post-submission process on ComplaintsBoard.com is relatively straightforward.
It has a verification process that makes it necessary to verify the individual’s identity by submitting the complaint.
Users hit the ‘File a complaint’ button at the top of the page. The site directs them to a page to share information about the company.
The reporter’s information on the form includes the company’s country, state, address, and website details.
The site instructs reporters to submit their negative experiences in detail. It is common to see repeated reports against one person or organization on this site.
The reporting process also involves the submission of photos and videos of the experience. (A look at the site shows that they allow very few media files).
The site then goes on to verify the email of the reporter. This process is mainly to ensure that the reported party can reach them.
Read More: How To Delete Content From ScamPulse.com
Unlike CheaterReport.com and CheaterLand.com, ComplaintsBoard.com censors submitted reports for inappropriate content.
Submitting a report and its eventual publishing can range from a couple of minutes to about 48 hours. They do not review the content at weekends.
ComplaintsBoard.com takes off whatever material that could cause them a legal brawl. As that would cause them time, they remove such materials.
They take off pornographic photos or videos. They also take down materials that have a possible breach of copyright laws.
After reviewing the report, ComplaintsBoard.com publishes them to the public.
ComplaintsBoard.com contacts the reported organization or individual, making the post public.
When doing this, they also create an account for the reported company. This account, according to them, would enable the reported party to contact the reporter and make amends.
ComplaintsBoard.com has a complaints resolution process that enables it to mark off complaints.
Note that this does not mean that the reporter or ComplaintsBoard.com has deleted the report from the website. The information will remain visible on both ComplaintsBoard.com and search engines, howbeit; it will be marked as resolved.
This is a slight difference that ComplaintsBoard.com has from other complaint submission platforms.
While it is fair that we celebrate the usefulness of a site like ComplaintsBoard.com, we also understand the other sides to it.
Its posting process continually puts businesses and service providers at a disadvantage.
It shows that anyone can take revenge on an organization, especially competitors.
They can also blackmail or sabotage an organization and get away with it.
This also means that a platform like ComplaintsBoard.com has the potential to put thriving set-up businesses in trouble for no fault of theirs. They would also be able to do very little to nothing about it.
Unfortunately, you cannot use ComplaintsBoard.com to court on the grounds of the report posted on their platform since it is a third-party posting site. It is immune.
Contrary to what some might believe, taking a post off ComplaintsBoard.com is not impossible.
We will show you how to take a legal route through the process and hope you find it helpful.
If, however, it turns out that you still need help with a ComplaintsBoard.com removal, Removes Reports can help you out.
ComplaintsBoard.com provides a series of legal documents for users to read. These documents include the Terms of Use, DMCA procedures, Frequently Asked Questions, their answers, Privacy Policy, and Legal Information.
While we would advise that you peek at them, it turns out that most of them are a bunch of repeated information.
We now provide you with a summary of all that you can find on the legal pages of ComplaintsBoard.com.
As expected, ComplaintsBoard.com mentions this article in its legal framework. Though not explicitly quoted, it turns out to be the spine of ComplaintsBoard.com.
For the most part, Section 230 (Its enactment in 1996 and the explosion of the Internet) has significantly allowed ComplaintsBoard.com to flourish.
It states as follows:
These twenty-six simple words ensure that no one can hold ComplaintsBoard.com responsible for any information it contains.
Court cases against ComplaintsBoard.com on the grounds of defamation often fail.
ComplaintsBoard.com responds to requests backed by the DMCA. Given the general laws of the Internet and intellectual trade, copyrights receive special protection.
This is one reason why ComplaintsBoard.com gives priority treatment to cases involving copyrights.
Though not directly involving their input, ComplaintsBoard.com advises against the publishing of reports that are under contract.
If the parties have agreed not to make any details of their transaction public, the reported party can take the other to court.
ComplaintsBoard.com does not hoard the details of its reporters if the reported party intends to contact them.
Read More: How To Get Yourself Removed From Letmeexpose.com
The ComplaintsBoard.com removal process is somewhat straightforward and challenging. The process and level of difficulty depending on the circumstances.
ComplaintsBoard.com provides the conditions that would enable them to take down posts. In some cases, they reveal that they reserve the right to choose to take down camps.
The steps to take down a post (or posts) from ComplaintsBoard.com would depend on the category of the reported individual.
It also depends on the possible implications of the post.
The first category of persons we shall address is those that do not mind a negative review. These persons can contact the author of the post to resolve the difference.
The resolution process is quite simple.
ComplaintsBoard.com may contact the affected party, as shown earlier.
The contracting process confirms that they have created an account for the affected company or individual.
To clarify the issue, you may leave a comment on the thread.
The comment should show that you are either innocent or have resolved the charge.
Upon receiving your comment, the author has about 30 days to repeal your claims.
If they fail to do so, the complaint is marked as resolved.
According to ComplaintsBoard.com, a report against a company should not be a cause for alarm.
What should be important is that the complaint is resolved.
Furthermore, they advise that affected organizations or individuals respond quickly to complaints against them. This would give them a good rating on the website.
We might as well agree that the site has gotten its popularity courtesy of becoming a rating platform for both individuals and companies.
Not everyone wants to resolve an issue on ComplaintsBoard.com.
Besides, having one’s profile on a reputation defamation site is not a good idea.
Hence, one should embark on a ComplaintsBoard.com removal.
This is also easy and difficult.
Yes, both.
We will show you how to go about this in straightforward steps.
We would also provide our convenient recommendation.
Firstly, let us ask ourselves, “Is it possible to take down a complaint?”
The answer to that question is a resounding “Yes.”
Howbeit, there are very few ways to achieve that. Find them below.
ComplaintsBoard.com responds to court orders to take down complaints.
Doing otherwise would portray them as breaching the law.
ComplaintsBoard.com provides a list of requirements on their DMCA procedure page to take advantage of this.
This procedure is the same with other sites. We provide a summary of the process with Scamion.com here.
If successful, ComplaintsBoard.com would take down the complaint.
This process also has limitations, as you must have seen from the page.
If the author challenges the decision to take it down with valid proof, ComplaintsBoard.com will restore the post.
As we have revealed earlier, ComplaintsBoard.com edits posts before they publish them.
They do this to remove contents that are inappropriate for public knowledge.
Contents that they remove include:
If ComplaintsBoard.com does not appropriately edit content before posting, the affected party can contact them to re-edit.
When the post details are bound by contract, the affected party can take them down.
The parties have agreed not to disclose details to a third party.
When a person goes against the provisions of such a contract, they bear the responsibility.
The affected party would contact the post author to take down such content.
As we have informed earlier, ComplaintsBoard.com does not take down posts except the affected party asks them to do so with a court order.
In this case, you can sue the author of the post.
They can also pay for damages if they are guilty.
Similarly, you can ask the author to apply for a takedown order that you can send to ComplaintsBoard.com to take down the post.
ComplaintsBoard.com provides its contact email address to send orders and information to it.
Following up on these processes requires knowledge of the system and financial commitment.
The legal practitioners would not mind charging you the most they can as they “help” you regain your reputation.
Hence, you may need to be ready to spend upwards of $1,500. Sometimes procedures can demand so much from you that you may lose track of business.
If this were the case, would you like to resolve the issue? Probably that would save you time and money.
Though easy, it does not entirely save you from having a negative portfolio online.
What else can you do?
An experienced reputation management agency like Remove Reports is what you should look for at such times.
While some organizations and individuals might have a chance at getting their details off ComplaintsBoard.com, others do not.
They may be guilty as charged.
What do they do? They stand no chance. That could be you!
It might be challenging to ask ComplaintsBoard.com to take down a post against you or ask the reporter to mark it as resolved.
It might aggravate them and create more trouble for you. What do you do at such times?
There are options for you.
Remove Reports can also be of help.
However, we present you with an idea that you might find helpful.
If you are inclined towards the intelligence of the Internet, search engines, and rankings, you must have learned how to use suppression.
People do not always look for defamation sites to know about you or your organization.
They type your name into a search engine like Google, Yahoo, or Bing.
The search engines would search the Internet for any URL that mentions your name. If it finds your name, it enlists it.
The suppression method involves creating better content for internet users.
If search engine spiders find the new content more appealing than the harmful content, they will rank it ahead.
This way, you can stay ahead of the game.
Well, except someone wants to keep creating harmful content against you.
With Remove Reports, you can continually stay ahead of any harmful content.
Read More: Remove Content From Defaulters.com
Sometimes you do not have copyright content or inappropriate content posted against you.
You may also not know how to use the suppression method.
Would you allow the post to remain there?
This section would be for you if you said a “No” to that.
Remove Reports offers a chance to people and organizations with little or no chance of having their details taken off ComplaintsBoard.com.
We have a record of helping businesses stay clean and remain in business. You can see that here.
The Internet is an excellent tool for expanding your business. Please do not allow it to cause your downfall.
While we are committed to ensuring that you remain market-worthy, we would continue to advise that you employ best practices in business.
ComplainstBoard.com is not the kind of place you should be listed.
They do not care.
The owners are only concerned about the website business model.
We are concerned about your business.
Do not hesitate to contact Remove Reports now.
What exactly is online data piracy? And, why is it such a colossal crime? Almost every nation has its own set of rules to limit the impact of piracy.
So, how about finding out what the term ‘Online Data Piracy’ means and how to fight against such an immoral act.
Online Data piracy means copying copyrighted content available online such as music, videos, software, and whatnot and distributing it at a cheaper rate or for free.
Despite piracy being illegal in almost every country, it still is in practice. And, as technology advances, the barriers to piracy keep clearing up.
While we are making better online surfing features for our consumers, it is becoming challenging to filter piracy activities.
The question is: How more profound is the impact of online data piracy, and how faster is it growing among us? And what haunts the data managers is that as long as data is shared and available online, online data piracy won’t stay away.
However, one can limit its growth and subsequently plummet it until it stops bothering the nations’ social and economic setup.
The unauthorized duplication of content restricted to be owned by an individual(s) or a group(s) leads to piracy.
It could be carried out online as well as offline.
For instance, a few years back, the copyrighted movies were hugely distributed among consumers, saved on a CD.
The original CD was copied to other C.D.s and sold much cheaper.
Although the video quality suffered miserably, the market boomed.
This is primarily because of the cheap rates of these copyrighted C.D.s, sold at less than one-tenth price of the original ones.
This entire process was still tedious and required tremendous effort. Later came the torrent websites.
These again were directly accessible to the consumers and offered free videos and audios.
Apart from the difficulty in finding the correct torrent link, these also imposed issues with the video quality.
But consumers did enjoy downloading tons of movies for free and watching whenever wanting to.
Governments from around the globe did realize that the act would lead to something very unprofitable to the entertainment industry and banned the use of such websites offering torrents.
Soon after, the app-based streaming options surfaced.
And, guess what, these made it even simpler for pirates to steal data and share it even more effortlessly. Plus, the pirated content now available is of good quality as well.
Isn’t it clear from the example that the technology advancements resulted in higher chances of online data piracy?
However, we cannot press the rewind button, can we?
The good news is that the countries are trying their best to formulate the strictest anti-piracy laws to ensure that these acts stop causing troubles that are considered enough to result in economic losses.
With time, the number of users accessing the Internet is surging. While a few years back, the usage was not widely spread, with the introduction of broadband and mobile data connection, the accessibility has increased manifold.
According to a survey alone in the U.S., the percentage of the population using the Internet to access content was recorded as 85.4% in 2019, which is expected to reach 87.2% by 2025.
Almost 284 million internet users in the USA use the web by different means, including laptops, mobile phones, and various other digital devices.
Although that is not a matter of concern, the problem lies in how people progress towards accessing illegal pirated content.
The DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act), the law designed to restrict the growth of digital piracy, was formed in 1998.
And, as per the prevailing situation, it won’t be incorrect to deem that digital piracy has become even more potent than ever.
The copyright holders face much more trouble because of online piracy than in 1998.
As per the research done by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Global Innovation Policy Center, there are almost 26.6 billion illegal views of movies directed in the U.S., along with 126.7 billion pirated views of T.V. episodes released in the U.S. every year.
Even worse, the economic impact of digital video piracy is much more than the movie or even television industries.
Digital video piracy costs a minimum of $29.2 billion in domestic revenues.
So, why are the online users committing the crime without taking any responsibility for the same?
It is most convenient to copy content rather than pay a hefty subscription for different streaming sites.
There has been an increase in digital online piracy because of these pirates’ handsome revenue.
These criminals use advertisements on their platforms to provide pirate sites a legal cover.
However, this does have another benefit to the criminals as well.
By using the ads, these pirates earn lucrative income. The statistics will shock you entirely if you look at the 2014 report.
According to this report, the top pirate sites earn almost $227 million only with the ads they publish on their website.
The story does not end here…
These pirate websites also carry malware and online threats for users.
Almost every 3 in 4 users face credit card scams or malware attacks.
Hence, it is essential to understand the various types of online piracy that exist.
This would enable users to stay informed and keep such online threats at bay.
Starting with the most usual type of piracy, the online streaming website is responsible for a high percentage of illegal content access.
In 2017, more than 73.9 billion visits were recorded for illegally accessing music. Apart from that, 53.2 billion trips happened to stream movies.
It becomes easy to access content using the streaming sites, hence justifying the huge user presence.
One does not have to download the video.
Instead, by simply streaming it online, one can watch videos or listen to music. There are two ways these websites work.
You may either get direct streaming on the website.
Or, you may be redirected to the link where the site hosts the video.
And, with time, these websites are becoming highly user-friendly.
Sometimes, users could not make a difference between legal and illegal choices.
The videos are divided into genres, languages, and various other filters.
What is a P2P network?
Peer to Peer networks is a connection of multiple computers connected over the web.
Hence, the sharing of files takes place without needing a central server.
In other words, every computer or node connected within a P2P network works as a client and the server.
Using the same technology, illegal content is shared between peers. One copy of the digital file moves from one node to another.
And that too, without having a central node for the same.
The transfer of files becomes easier in such an arrangement of nodes.
And, there aren’t just a few computers connected to the P2P network.
On the contrary, there are millions of nodes present worldwide.
The other most significant problem that comes with P2P sharing is the default setting of the network.
This allows the users to upload the content every time they download a digital file.
Hence, involving every user in sharing illegal content online.
In such a scenario, one can even expose the private files to strangers when permitting access to public ones.
Cyberlockers
Another type of online piracy happens through Cyberlockers. These are file storage and sharing services.
And includes all kinds of content to store and share.
Starting from photos to videos to audio files, you can share various types of content using Cyberlockers.
These services stand out because of their fast and convenient file sharing protocols.
Plus, users can stay anonymous when distributing content.
One can download as well as a stream using these services.
The services are up for a subscription, making these criminals earn massive income through pirated content.
Linking Websites
As the name suggests, these sites are a hub to hundreds and thousands of links to pirated content often saved on the cyberlockers.
These websites are very useful in locating the hidden content on the Internet, cyberlockers being unsearchable.
Torrents
Almost everyone knows about torrent sites.
These have been quite popular before broadband came in.
Even with a fast internet connection, users depend on torrent sites to download illegal content.
But did you know that film groups create torrents for sharing content using their private torrent sites?
While the websites rely on the members’ donations.
However, with many pirates out there, the content on the private torrents quickly turns to the public torrent sites.
We are making the content illegally available for anyone to use and download.
Once again, these public torrent websites are a hub for malware and viruses.
Still, users visit them for free content, participating indirectly in data piracy.
Consider different social strata thinking about consuming digitally pirated content:
1) Downloading one song from a file-sharing site instead of paying for it just because the artist is a multi-millionaire, the person downloading the song thinks the artist doesn’t need their hard-earned cash.
And therefore chooses to listen to the song accessible, not only when it plays on the radio, but also whenever she or she wants. Or share it with one’s friends and get credit for it?
2) Why buy expensive movie tickets and go to see them in the theater? Why not wait till it gets pirated or even watch a copy of new movies before they even hit the theaters?
3) Paying dollars for buying software? Instead, download it free and pay a few bucks to get the authentication codes.
Statistics of the conducted studies
The strictness of the legal law enforcement in various nations:
Below are some of the customary laws in place in multiple countries to stop digital piracy.
Japan:
Japan holds the award for enforcing the strictest law enforcement in digital piracy.
Under the controversial ACTA treaty, the law threatens infringers with throttled internet speeds.
There are a 2 million Yen OK with up to 2 years in prison for downloading.
The number of years increases to 10 for uploading.
Theoretically, this is speaking of the law, but jail time has rarely been awarded for downloading only in practice.
The noteworthy point is VPNs are not currently illegal in Japan, and in fact, many websites advise torrenters for using VPNs to bypass copyright laws.
These are used to change users’ geolocation, and it is because of this it is impossible to ascertain how many users would exactly be circumventing laws through this means.
Germany:
Germany is another country that has strict anti-piracy laws, apart from everything else, at least for torrenting.
They are often hit with fines between €300 – €1000 for downloading a single movie.
But trends in Germany reveal that the place where torrenting flounders, streaming thrives.
The scenario is evident in Germany, where the popular streaming site Movie4k claims 59.7% of its visitors.
U.K.: U.K. has its medium-strict approach for enforcing copyright law, which tends to monitor P2P networks. It lays pressure on ISPs to block sites and send warnings to infringers.
Sites like The Pirate Bay have already been blocked by the five biggest ISPs of the U.K. in the follow-up of a 2012 court case. The U.K. also has anti-piracy groups like FACT, which prosecute the offenders.
Apart from groups, government education programmers like the Creative Content U.K. (CCUK) have launched torrenting alert letters in a campaign called ‘Get it Right.’
However, a study in the nation reveals how 72% of the total U.K. broadband users believe that the warnings will fail, as there is still no real penalty to the infringer.
USA:
Speaking of the United States, they launched the Six Strikes program in 2011. This program pledged to follow notices and implement penalties like throttling internet speeds temporarily.
Very soon, the bluff of this program was called, and after six strikes, the pirates never received any penalty. And so the digital pirates continued to do what they were doing, and then, eventually, the program was ultimately dropped in January.
Piracy in the U.S. is as increasing as anywhere else; Hollywood notices this increase.
Attempts by the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) aims to end advertising applications that are pirated.
The organization has made other significant efforts during the years, like advocating for controversial SOPA and PIPA bills.
They recently supported the global coalition ACE, which sees rivals like Netflix and Disney uniting against piracy.
Switzerland:
Among the list of countries where downloading copyrighted works is allowed for personal use Switzerland.
The country where laws benefit and protect torrenters and prohibit third parties from monitoring peer-to-peer networks.
Although digital pirating is not entirely allowed there, uploading a file for torrenting is illegal.
Netherlands:
Describing the Netherlands, piracy is rampant, copyright law and enforcement are similarly careful.
The Anti-piracy group BREIN has recently begun making waves and famously bringing one piracy box seller to the European Court of Justice.
Another instance is the case between BREIN and internet service providers Ziggo and XS4ALL, where the ruling given by The European Court of Justice says that the ISPs must block The Pirate Bay.
Everything of this sort suggests that other sites previously found not liable for their index content.
Examples of those sites include Google, which is told to be at risk.
Spain:
The Spanish copyright law considers every intent to profit from torrenting or otherwise infringing on a copyright.
It should be noted that Spain has the fifth-highest rate of piracy worldwide.
Almost a quarter of internet users visiting piracy sites are from Spain.
Canada, Brazil, and India:
While countries like Canada, Brazil, and India have ultra-lax copyright laws and enforcement.
They have been placed on the U.S. International Trade Administration’s (ITA) watch list for their poor behavior in enforcing Intellectual Property.
More than 35 percent of films watched in India go through the problem of digital piracy.
Whereas Canada “does not recognize” a piracy problem.
They point to researcher bias in the ITA, which as per the argument given by them, relies “on allegations from U.S. industry stakeholders.”
Europe:
This country has the biggest problem with piracy in the world.
Many European governments have given their best by bringing significant changes to the E.U. copyright law, and because of this reason, they are currently being voted on.
The controversy is something these changes have met and not appreciated.
Europe is a classic example of how tricky the problem of combatting piracy today is.
And how it cannot be done without breaching privacy or ‘censoring the Internet.
Digging into it a little would tell you that just as Google can link to illegal sites without risking liability, the sites that links to are frequently indexers of video hosters akin to Youtube.
And therefore, there is nothing else but equally immune as intermediaries, and any efforts to change this have been fiercely opposed.
Many E.U. countries have also made efforts to educate younger generations on this threat of digital piracy and challenge innovation and creativity.
They have been recommending legal ways to consume on-demand content. Still, the question here lies, will these recommendations be enough to stop a new generation from taking advantage of no-risk, free, on-demand content?
The chances are that until such legislation is drawn up, one that can reflect the changing relationship that any creative work must have with the Internet, legislation that benefits creators and users equally, there is a need for a stop-gap for recovering recover I.P. from instances of infringement.
Despite attempts by the nations to take strict actions against piracy, pirates come up with circumvention techniques.
So, the laws used against piracy are easily broken by pirates in the field.
Although Piracy in Japan is not easily traceable, a quick internet search can tell you certainly that it happens there too.
There is always an ongoing debate amongst people about the availability of digital content for free and chargeable.
Not everyone who uses the Internet is a computer pirate.
From the ones using it, most people abide by the laws and pay for the content they consume, irrespective of its price.
However, there isn’t a lack of users who believe that software, movies, music, and games should be freely available.
This leads to confusion in the system, and piracy can be said as a bridge that exists in between.
It connects the other side of the audience and brings them by satisfying their say on digital content.
Here are some of the other such specifics reasons:
1) As mentioned above, the most common reason for digital piracy is the unwillingness to pay. People, you, me, anyone love things available for free.
Websites like Torrent and P2P sharing make it easier than ever to download content that’s available for some cost, free.
Such platforms let you obtain everything from software to movies and books for free.
And the fact that it doesn’t take much time to download those links is just more convenient.
2) There is also a vast audience out there who does this out of necessity. They want to consume the content, but they cannot afford it. They download illegally due to financial hardship because they cannot afford to buy it. They have no other option to reach out to the source rather than piracy.
3) Then, this fantastic audience runs on a specific belief that companies have enough money already. The purchasing content by paying for it makes not much difference to the company. Anyways, others are paying it, so they decide to slide away from it. This gives them a right to distribute to the less fortunate freely and gives everyone a chance to enjoy or use it.
They hire some hackers or are one. 4) Then some people do it for financial gain. By downloading pirated content to resell it, they profit even more than the company with a right to sell it.
5) There is also this part of people like hackers and social engineers who use pirated content for spreading malware and infecting a user’s system.
6) People also find excuses for buying pirated content like One-time use. Users have also come up with reasons like seeing if a movie is any good before watching it at the theater.
Similarly, one may want to download software to run a singular task and after using it once they delete it or uninstall the software.
These people do not see digital piracy as theft for one reason or another.
Or not as big as theft, as stealing someone’s money or valuable.
Case Study: Effect of Digital Piracy on The U.S. Economy by Global innovation Policy Center
GIPC released this study on June 18th, 2019. The study focuses on the Impacts of Digital Piracy on the U.S. Economy.
An important question that this study answer is how the boon, i.e., American content creation and circulation, becomes bane by the impact of digital piracy.
The Complete study done by GIPC can be divided into two parts where. The first part estimates the revenue lost to U.S. producers by providing an answer to three specific questions:
After determining the revenue lost amount, the next step involved calculating the overall economic losses to the American economy.
For calculating this, the researchers have used IMPLAN, an established national macroeconomic input-output model that estimates revenue loss to measure direct, indirect, and induced effects on the economy.
Conclusive Findings of the report
Professor’s take on digital piracy
Carnegie Mellon University professor’s prediction about 2020 is that this year could bring new regulations and laws for protecting consumers from data privacy risks and block pirate sites.
Ari Lightman predicts lawmakers to tighten regulations on social media networks.
This he predicts as part of a push for more transparency from digital giants.
Currently, he is a professor of digital media and marketing. Doing this, he says, would legally mandate auditing of third-party applications to ensure that the user data they collect adheres to security and privacy measures.
Further on, Lightman expects such kinds of regulations to address data ownership and rights.
Another professor Michael D. Smith, questions whether U.S. policymakers will follow the lead given by more than 40 countries.
These countries have blocked access to known pirate sites, and the professor expects the USA to do the same.
He is a professor of information technology and marketing. He says that pirated sites provide free downloads of movies, music, and other content.
Pointing to research, the professor says how digital piracy harms artists and consumers.
Specifically, he says that reducing the amount of content produced profitably, particularly projects with high artistic value.
Prediction by Ari Lightman
2020 will see organizations becoming more transparent to individuals to show how data is collected, shared, used, and monetized.
Not only that, but also the year will see the organization take their responsibility for communicating to users how they collect personal data and distribute it in aggregate for malicious intent.
Because currently, organizations are constantly collecting users’ data, including their personally identifiable information and less sensitive information such as streaming video consumption patterns and content generation.
It is to be noted how less sensitive data can be combined to socially engineer and make up virtually someone’s identity.
The issue here is about data use. Essential questions like the data collected by the company do remain stored for research and development, marketing, customer service, and support? Does it get shared with other authorized partners?
Depending on the answer, the classification of data and its use should be shared with consumers who will decide.
Decisions like whether to allow this activity and consider what it might mean for them or not.
For example, social media networks’ implications aggregate user data on just about everything.
Not just that, but they also combine it with other data stores.
This provides a sort of gateway opportunity for advertisers to hyper-target consumers.
In a way, social media networks allow users to share their data with third-party applications instead of letting an application use it.
Prediction by Michael Smith
Many reviewed academic literature consistently shows how digital piracy causes economic harm to creative artists.
In turn, that harm harms consumers by reducing the amount of content produced profitably.
This is to be noted particularly for projects that have high artistic value.
The critical question raised by these findings is that now that we know the harm done by pirate content, shouldn’t the governments pass laws to block access to sites providing pirate content?
On the one hand, industry observers argue that such laws will be ineffective because piracy, they say, is a game of whack-a-mole.
If you shut down one site, five others will pop up in their place.
So as long as consumers can find piracy, they will never switch back to legal channels.
A 2019 peer-reviewed study Mr. Smith co-authored with Rahul Telang through Carnegie Mellon’s Initiative for Digital Entertainment Analytics shows different results.
Their research finds that a law in the U.K. that requires ISPs to block access to significant pirate sites has caused the nation’s consumers to increase their use of legal channels by 7 to 12%.
So, again it gives rise to another question: Should 2020 be the year where U.S. lawmakers join lawmakers from 42 other countries worldwide in passing laws to protect their consumers — and their creative industries — by blocking access to well-known pirate sites?
2020 sees a massive rise in Digital Piracy
Many films and hit shows such as Contagion, Tiger King, etc., have been huge draws for streaming services. Is that true? Has 2020 brought with it a rise in digital piracy?
Illegal websites that host pirated copies also see a rise because of the restrictions laid on people during the lockdown.
Business is booming in the industry at the same pace as digital piracy on these sites since stay-at-home orders went into effect in many countries.
As per the statistics, visits by U.S. and U.K. residents on these sites jumped about 31% from February to March.
London-based Muso TNT Ltd conducted the research. This company also tracks piracy trends said that numbers from Germany, Portugal, Spain, and India were comparable. However, Italy saw the most significant jump, at over 50%.
In March, the rise in U.S. users meant that 19,000 website addresses registered in the company’s database drew 137 million page views that month.
Andy Chatterley’s words claim to see a rise in film and T.V. piracy in every territory of the world spike for the last three years.
The research also claims how the weekend’s film piracy is currently beating the weekday’s film piracy by a fair number.
One reason for the sharp rise in traffic to websites that host illegal live television streams is banning sporting events.
Fifty percent more advertisements have been served by the top pirate sites in the U.S., U.K., Germany, France, Italy, and Spain in the first quarter compared with the previous quarter.
The data is provided by White Bullet Solutions Ltd., a London-based company that tracks advertising and supports intellectual property theft.
Pirate website operators are also in demand by enticing users to capitalize on this spike.
They do so by offering them buying subscription packages, offering deals marketed as Covid-19, and self-isolation discounts, experts say.
Different Perspective on Piracy – Harmful or Harmless?
Lots of debate keep surfacing when it comes to underlining the theory that leads to the losses caused due to piracy.
Scholars keep bringing online piracy’s economic and social impact with various alarming statistics.
However, some groups have entirely different beliefs about piracy.
Looking through the glasses of different perspectives brings us to a confusing dead end.
But it is also true that the flames do not exist without fire.
Although the intensity of such attacks seems like a far-fetched dream, many can provide numbers to prove their take.
So, why not find out what each side has to say. Is online data piracy a curse or nothing to worry about? Or even helpful for the artists and content creators?
Data Piracy is Harmful
Starting with what we have all been listening to from the beginning, data piracy is terrible.
There is a lot of research on this subject, and scholars and experts have come up with plenty of data to support their call.
As per the chamber of commerce, there is a total loss of 30 billion dollars in the U.S. every year because of data piracy.
Not just that, the report says that the threat results in almost 560,000 jobs in the industry every year.
And, there are many other remarks made by the responsible organizations that leave us thinking about piracy as a massive culprit for an economic slowdown.
When going to a market and stealing things without paying for the items is a crime, why does not the same theory apply to online content piracy?
If we buy books, online piracy certainly is a very alarming threat. If not plummeted, it could bring a more significant problem to the content creators and those owning the copyrights for these contents.
A very well justified reason for believing that data piracy is harmful to the economy of the nations.
Is Data Piracy Harmless Completely?
Coming down to the next set of debaters who believe that online data piracy has nothing to do with the social and economic setup problems, here is what you must learn.
According to the reports represented through infographics by Go-Gulf, almost 70 percent of online users believe that there is nothing wrong with data piracy.
Not just that, the same report outlined that 22 percent of the global internet bandwidth is used for online piracy.
Because users believe that data piracy is not an issue, their number keeps increasing every year. But does that mean the notion is correct?
As per the Government Accountability Office report in 2010, one cannot track or substantiate a methodology for calculating losses due to data piracy.
In other words, the numbers illustrating losses do not have good data backing to prove the stance.
At the same time, the report confirmed that there had been a considerable decrease in the revenue of industries creating sharable data.
However, linking those losses directly to data piracy without proof also does not feel justifiable.
Although the report did not provide immunity to online data privacy when accused of contributing to the loss to content creators, it did point out that the allegations are inflated without proper data backing.
Plus, scholars also believe that users with an insufficient budget to buy the copyrighted item often choose to go for the pirated ones.
This again brings us to one more fact essential to notice.
So, those who are opting for pirated content actually won’t be contributing to the revenue of the content creator anyway.
So, how is data piracy harming economic losses? The truth is, it does pose a threat to the content industry, however to what extent is difficult to calculate.
Data Piracy is Helpful
No doubt, we have already clarified many points regarding data piracy and its impact.
However, it isn’t easy to understand why users still seem to enjoy pirated content.
On the other hand, users feel that piracy helps expose talents, unknown otherwise.
For instance, if users do not like an artist, they won’t pay for the new album or movie featuring that particular artist.
On the other hand, one may like to listen to or watch the album or movie if available for free.
Some may feel that this argument isn’t very firm while undermining many economic principles.
However, it shows that a long list of downloads happening over the Internet would never have occurred if piracy wasn’t the key to arousing interest.
Hence, it must not be a lost sale anyway to the content creator of the artist.
The above assumption is more of an ideology while failing to justify piracy. So, it is still difficult to prove that online data piracy is helpful.
Understanding the various perspective of the users and scholars, it is lucid that data piracy does contribute to the economic fall.
However, it still isn’t clear how much participation the threat has in the losses made to the entertainment or other content creation industries.
Looking at the bigger picture and generalizing the situation, it is against the law to break into the private content available on the Internet and distribute it without the owner’s permission.
If not wholly, data privacy affects the profit of content industries and lures users into accessing the data for free instead of paying for it.
Since the onset of online data piracy threats, it seems that eliminating the problem isn’t a practical aim.
Hence, one must also look for adaptation to lessen the impact of piracy and its implications.
OTT platforms and pirated sites remain the only option during lockdown for entertainment.
The demand seems obvious because OTT platforms and television are the primary sources of entertainment in most houses during lockdown times.
Netflix is to have added more than double the number of subscribers it forecast in the first quarter of 2020.
Walt Disney Co. claims it had 50 million subscribers to its Disney+ service on April 8, which is almost twice the subscribers that they’ve had in early February.
Funny is that Disney+ told investors about their prediction in the last year that it expected 60 million to 90 million signups by the end of fiscal 2024.
Not only have social media companies cracked down on piracy by banning certain content and URLs, but law-enforcement agencies have also arrested people behind online piracy in various countries.
Experts say such criminal groups often cut across borders and constantly adapt to avoid censors, and because of which they are the hardest to track.
In its advisory issue, Europol warns consumers about black-market streaming and how it could also expose users to cyberattacks.
Mr. Mark Mulready explained the disadvantages of pirated content by putting it out in front of people. It could carry malware that infects computers and allows hackers to access users’ home networks and personal information.
Mark Mulready is the vice president of cybersecurity services in a Netherlands-based security company named Irdeto B.V.
European officials briefed this company about similar concerns in the videogame industry.
Adding to it, Mr. Mulready said that a certain number of people will always be willing to take that risk of damaging their systems.
The question is how to stop them from doing so?
Repercussions of Digital Piracy
There isn’t any sure-shot way of estimating the cost of any digital content.
Think about the high-end software packages you have purchased, maybe for your home or company.
The cost can be as small as repairing your vehicle or as big as buying the most luxurious one.
As famous as the Internet is, so famous digital piracy is. It is a form of copyright infringement. Can everyone who needs one afford these prices?
Piracy, as talked above, is not just limited to software but includes movies, music, books, games, any and everything associated with the word digital.
When something has as big a definition as digital piracy does, it has many consequences, and so is digital piracy.
Downloading and distributing copyrighted material and intellectual property without paying for it is digital piracy.
It is almost like knowing about a good patented invention before someone does and then selling that to them just because they do not have the information about it.
Digital Piracy violates federal copyright laws and can result in steep fines and imprisonment.
You may think of digital piracy as a form of digital theft.
This act can cost companies billions of dollars each year, and the enormity of this is that it is not just about financial loss.
What can Digital Piracy lead to?
Imagine that you are an aspiring songwriter and musician to get a glimpse of how high the repercussions of digital piracy can be.
Having invested an entire year writing your first album, it is produced and out there in the market.
It has the hits that you always dreamed of! As a result of the album getting hit, you start to make a lot of money.
After some time, you discover that your album has been copied, and its copies are distributed for free over the Internet.
And slowly begin to lose money, and things get so bad that you cannot afford to write a second album and eventually face a financial loss.
In addition to all this, you discover a person selling your album for a reduced price.
The outcome of this is that you are not only losing money, but someone else is profiting from your work.
What option do you have apart from the copyright laws? You would have no legal recourse.
Apart from getting you into dealing with all the legal trouble, digital piracy also has implications for cybersecurity.
Hackers can use one of the strategies to spread malware, trojans, and viruses via pirated content.
If you are a company using pirated software, you are opening yourself up to copyright violation and infringement.
At the same time, you are also exposing your networks to potential malware or virus infection. Hackers then use these infected systems to launch an attack or even mine cryptocurrency.
Downloading from Torrent comes with its own risk. Those who download and even distribute pirated content from Torrent their I.P. addresses are public and quickly tracked.
And one thing to note is that the pirated software cannot be updated, and because of remaining stagnant, it opens the system to attack through the use of vulnerabilities.
Pirated operating systems will have critical services disabled like firewalls and updates; this results in open vulnerabilities and less security.
Experts take on the rise in digital piracy.
Sergio Tirro says how criminals are very flexible. He is the head of Europol’s Intellectual Property Crime Coordination Center.
This organization is currently working along with other European law enforcement agencies to track the growth in piracy.
He also says organized crime groups have increased their marketing around coronavirus conditions.
Sheila Cassells points out how European regulators asked streaming services such as Netflix Inc. to temporarily slow down the transmission speeds.
This incident happened in March. Netflix was asked to do so to avoid overloaded broadband networks.
Some illicit sites even pointed to what they saw as a competitive edge during this time.
She is the executive vice president of the Audiovisual Anti-Piracy Alliance.
On how pirated sites work, she says they’ve seen several pirate sites making a point that they still offer a high definition.
Audiovisual Anti-Piracy Alliance is an organization that represents broadcast rights owners that includes European soccer leagues and satellite television companies such as Comcast Corp.’s Sky business.
Something more than just enforcement is required to stop digital piracy.
According to the results given out by GIPC, digital piracy is not only a crime but also an action that has destructive ripple effects on the U.S. economy.
On the one hand, it restricts revenue and jobs and inhibits the creative potential of America’s most innovative minds.
Digital Piracy is responsible for treating people who celebrate creativity and underpins technology and design.
It allows criminals to steal art, even by sitting thousands of miles from the creator.
And in this manner, it robs away America’s artists and the companies that employ them.
Their revenues are nullified based on their talent and hard work, translating into lost jobs.
In addition to this, digital piracy gives criminals an avenue to exploit unsuspecting people by leaving malware or identify theft in their systems.
This act of theirs causes even more significant damage to Americans. You can also read an ALEC article based on the same phenomenon on their website.
The dangers like these highlight the need for extensive intellectual property protection.
Older trade agreements dealing with IPR are currently not efficient for the running systems. That can be considered outdated because of their minor or almost no reference to internet capabilities.
The government’s responsibility is to support negotiations that bring IPR into the digital age.
USMCA has started with an excellent model that deals with the digital trade chapter, which can be a frontrunner in explaining this to governments.
As content owners worldwide are increasingly worried about seeing the value of their investments taken away by concerted piracy attacks, here are some ways to stop digital piracy.
Apart from other content piracy, video piracy is an area with both causes for hope and motivation for alarm on a global level.
A side is working on increasing industry initiatives that are stopping the acceleration of piracy.
Another side is finding more and more ways that the pirates can get illegal content to the consumer.
Although not significant to ones that do not have much technical knowledge, the barriers to viewing pirated material once upon a time were substantial enough to put many ones off.
Pirated files that are to be found on torrent indexing sites, malware, and poor quality material needed to be sifted out.
Filed that had to be downloaded were often converted and then coaxed to play on a television set.
The file’s picture quality was often poor, and the audio sometimes worse.
Speaking about the time, right now, everything is so much easier.
Nowadays, consumers are looking for illegal content that can choose from many viewing platforms called live streaming pirated material.
What was once the pivot towards app-based television has opened up whole libraries of pirated material on set-top boxes and more.
The question is, what can operators do? In the age where we’ve broken down the anti-piracy protection measures that broadcasters and operators can take into different areas, as adapted from a presentation given by Olivier Dufour, CEO France, Motorsport Network.
These areas are individually powerful in their own right. Still, when taken together, they represent a new culture of affirmative anti-piracy action that represents a step-change in the battle against the content pirates.
Making the Price Affordable
Amongst many different ways of dealing with piracy, this one is the most effective. In a way, you are giving no reason for the hacker to hack into your content and pirate it.
You can start doing this by removing the incentive for the consumers looking for pirated content.
Doing this would mean that you offer a good product and a good user experience at a fair price.
Take, for example, the new Disney+ SVOD service launched in the fall of their product at a market price of $6.99 per month.
The differentiation bar between them and Netflix is set at the high end because Netflix offers $12.99.
Indeed, price is not the only differentiator, and the importance of the user experience cannot be understated.
What does a user generally want? They want sympathetic interfaces that contain the usual sophisticated bells and whistles.
The list includes personal recommendations and excellent picture quality with no buffering and latency.
The struggle here is to provide these things at a realistic cost.
The more efficiently an industry does it, the fewer people will be driven towards pirate arms.
In this way, you can eliminate people consuming pirated content because they cannot afford it.
Getting more people to agree that doing piracy is wrong
Why does a person who knows piracy is illegal does not practice it?
The answer is that they have some code of ethics and agreement to the law they subscribe to.
Although several strands do this effectively, the goal is to highlight to the consumer that piracy is a crime and illegal.
The people inside the industry know this, but it is not evident for people outside it.
The main factor here to consider is password and login credential sharing.
And the fact that it was done by almost 50 percent of the people makes the crime look so typical that even when we know it is illegal to do so, we do it with ease.
There are two arguments here: either the law should be changed, and password sharing should be made legal, or there should be a technology brought into a place that stops one from doing so.
The latter should not be done at the risk of interrupting a person’s privacy.
We have to accept that this has become a normative crime.
It is becoming an activity that no longer appears illegal because the behavior is expected.
Directed efforts remind viewers that piracy is morally wrong and crime can prove successful in driving down numbers, especially those who give an example of speeding.
Video piracy is prevalent enough that maybe it should replace speeding in textbooks.
Although campaigns have highlighted organized crime in pirate activities and an opening to malware and inappropriate material, advertisers have always negatively associated with pirate sites.
Attentive measures at both ends
Ending piracy would want you to work in both ways, i.e., consumers as well as pirates.
Gone is the era of unprotected content; nowadays, content owners want to protect their investment by protecting their Intellectual Property rights.
So they are going only to strike licensing deals with such operators that can demonstrate who seriously take such threats to the revenue stream.
This is like setting in a new pipeline because the previous one was severely eroded.
This is a practice that should be done in a kept changing all the time.
Remember the system where card-based Conditional Access Systems were as sophisticated as operators could get.
Since we have moved towards I.P. and OTT delivery, a transition to software-based Digital Rights Management has come in turn.
After this transition, too, no single technology can guarantee security.
Arguably, the best practice involves a multi-disciplinary approach that combines both prophylactic anti-piracy measures and the following two criteria governing detection and enforcement.
Technology that should be brought into the system
A system should be brought into a place to identify the pirated content’s ghost in this scenario.
The absence of this system in place in the ecosystem is not letting us do half of the work.
Although bringing in this system requires technical intervention at the pre-transmission stage.
To start with, monitoring is the key to success here, be it automated monitoring.
Some exciting developments in A.I. monitoring of video streams are both deployed and underdeveloped.
To get a check about the ideal world, at least for now, a hybrid solution is typically deployed.
This system should tell you whenever the breach has been detected and when necessary to deal with the violation.
Bringing in place such a system has become more critical in recent years, like ever before.
Piracy has pivoted towards real-time streaming and the lucrative illegal revenue streams associated with the live sport.
High-level agreements with the search engines and social networks that consumers use to locate pirated content are key to rapid and real-time action.
The speed with a directive action is key.
T.V. Service Providers can play an important role in interrupting and removing pirated content, from the traditional take-down notices to increasingly sophisticated real-time messages.
By providing the correct anti-piracy services, operators can identify consumers watching illegal streams and incentivize them to switch to legitimate services.
Such actions scale from soft to hard, in which the harder countermeasures involve the introduction of law enforcement authorities.
An important criterion over here that comes into play is the speed at which you do things.
The speed at which results come to you and the speed at which you implement those results.
Although the prosecution in piracy cases will always be a much slower process that happens after piracy.
Removing the content from the Internet as swiftly as possible is one of the best solutions to deter pirates and drive consumers towards legal alternatives.
Companies should cooperate against digital piracy.
Although companies always speak about the losses they face via digital content pirating, they never cooperate with their competitors in digital content creation and wage war against digital content piracy.
Steps should be taken at the industry level, as steps are taken to accolade someone for good work, to acknowledge people doing bad work by pirating the digital content, an art piece that took the creator’s years of hard work.
The complete process should be rethought and remanufactured from production and on-set content security through the transmission to set an example of piracy-free digital content.
Herd immunity is a vital aspect while considering the impacts of digital piracy.
More and more companies and organizations involved in figuring out a solution give more and more chances for the solution to become effective overall.
But this also works the other way out, so say there is a weak spot in the chain at any point, though it is there at a place that is out of the sight of people currently, it can be considered as one of the primary routes with which piracy can enter the system.
And all our safeguards can be exploited using this weak spot.
Companies should find such weak spots present in the system and make sure they are nullified at whatever cost it takes.
For the sake of stopping digital piracy, they should take help from their competitor if needed and talk openly about the concerns of digital piracy.
Amid all the struggles companies face to create unique entertainment options for their users, the fear of digital piracy attacks is terrifying.
With the increase in the intrusion of privacy and copyright infringements, entertainment agencies have become completely impossible to remain untouched by the implications of digital piracy.
And those working hard to offer their customers a unique digital experience are affected the most.
Hence, in this article, we have summoned 6 different ways to put restrictions on such advancements.
Gone are the days when pirated contents weren’t much of a concern.
Although it could considerably affect the entertainment agencies, it still wasn’t simple for every user to transform the pirated content into useful files operational on Television or computers.
One had to look for the right file going through tons of torrent indexing websites.
There used to be huge chances of introducing malware when doing so.
Hence, many users kept themselves away from enjoying the free pirated content even when knowing such practices.
And, the efforts did not end there.
After you have downloaded the files, these versions often needed conversion to the right format.
Moreover, the poor picture and voice quality made it difficult for the users to watch the video beyond all the trouble.
For these reasons, DCMA and other concerned departments were not very strict at all.
However, time changed, and we moved to app-based devices, including smart televisions, making it easier for intruders to provide individuals with better quality and easily accessible pirated content.
No more need to download the contents.
Just open the platform and live stream the videos you wish to watch.
Isn’t that a lot easier? That is why anti-piracy policies became the need of the hour.
Operators are fighting to prevent piracy. Many experts have shared their policies to make stronger laws and restrictions.
At DCMA’s TVLS 2018 event, in his presentation, Olivier Dufour, the CEO of Motorsport Network, suggested a few measures to strengthen anti-piracy policies further.
Offer Better Incentives to Customers than Pirated Apps are Offering
There are a few reasons why consumers look for pirated content. And the most obvious one is affordability.
Talking about the budget, the pirated content is primarily available free of charge.
While operators cannot win on that front.
It can offer better incentives to its users.
For instance, it keeps the prices fair and backs its user experience through A.I. leveraged interfaces.
This means offering users suggestions based on their past viewed content.
I let them create their watch list and provide options to set alerts for upcoming videos.
There could be many other ways operators could keep their customers glued to their subscriptions forever.
By finding better user experience strategies, operators could defeat digital pirates.
Do not forget to offer excellent picture quality because this is where pirated content lags. So, better to make most of the weaknesses.
Create Awareness
It is essential to educate consumers that piracy is illegal, not just for those who copy content and present it to the viewers but also for those who take advantage of it.
In short, those watching pirated content also contribute to piracy as a whole.
And, this is not just that.
From accessing apps that share pirate content to sharing passwords of the subscription that one holds, anything against the legal compliance gives piracy a headway.
Moreover, it is also crucial that the consumers understand the moral obligations towards those providing them entertainment content.
Threats for Pirates
It is equally essential to restrict pirates from stealing video content as its crucial to make consumers aware of the legal way of streaming online content.
Because unprotected content is no longer a choice, the creators look for operators that offer licensing deals.
The content creators look for channels and platforms that could provide safety to their content and have strict policies against infringers.
And, it must not only be on papers, though. One should put that into practice when the need arises.
Effective Technological backing
To stop piracy, one must first find out the contents being stolen and where it is parked.
In short, find the pirated content and the pirate streaming platform.
To do so, operators must have fully functional and practical technological backing at the pre-transmission stage.
Constant monitoring, either AI-based or manual, must be taken into consideration.
You can even rely on a hybrid solution accompanying a certain percentage of automation along with human intervention to keep a complete watch.
After finding the breach, one must promptly put that down.
Operators must seek agreements from search engines and social media platforms to make the entire process smoother and fast.
Use Legal Enforcements
Either use traditional take-down notices or more sophisticated options such as real-time messages for moving from pirated solutions to a legal chance.
Utilizing the right anti-piracy services would be easier to check those consumers relying on pirated streaming.
Hence, making it easier to reach them through the listed ways.
The faster the results are achieved, the better is the outcome.
Hence, removing such illegal streaming would speed up the cause for protecting digital content rather than bringing consumers to the legal authorities.
A Common Goal
Streaming agencies compete to secure the top positions.
However, if one wants to eliminate piracy successfully, companies must cooperate to put efforts together.
And this must take place at every level of operation.
Serious troubles like spending time in jail time and fines can be subjected to you.
However, legal trouble is not the only threat to digital piracy.
There are also system threats like malware and vulnerabilities.
What seems harmless costs billions every year in damages and loss.
And the result of this loss is that cost impacts consumers through increased prices.
When you are downloading something illegal, you know you shouldn’t do this, but you still do it.
So, ideally, the only way to protect yourself from piracy is not to download illegally.
It would be best to use licensed software from trusted sites and not accept copies given to you from friends or unfamiliar sources.
Remember to look for trial versions or free software when you cannot afford one.
Open-source software is a great free alternative to digital piracy. Recurring payment may drastically reduce piracy. Or making software affordable could ease out one-time fee burnout.
You can use such streaming services to listen to music, watch movies, and wait until more affordable subscriptions.
These steps can spare you a lot of trouble in the end, and you need to get away from it because the consequences of digital piracy are genuine.
And no one else but you can protect yourself from the dangers.
The Verdict
It is undoubtedly very challenging to put a complete full stop to piracy.
While entertainment industries cannot share their content for free, the pirates would always find ways to lure consumers for their benefit.
In such a scenario, we must at least try to progress and mitigate together to lessen the side effects of the crime at our disposal.
Fighting with acceptable and actionable policies could help legal authorities counter the problem significantly.
One should submit a profile in a top legal directory to get more objective-specific clients as a lawyer.
According to a survey by Greentarget and consultancy Zeughauser, a lawyer directory listing is the sixth most important factor among clients.
This factor has been increasing higher than 67% since 2017.
Increased engagement with the internet has been essential in bringing about this trend.
Lawyer directory listing is more relevant than other factors like online portfolios and recommendations.
Google also created directories through the Google My Business platform.
It is no mystery that present-day professionals utilize one form of an online tool or another.
Classified directories represent a transition from self-promotion to an automated and robust system.
Being a tool for promotion, lawyer directories submissions ensure that any lawyer can get the right clients and referrals.
Lawyers need to be well aware of the implications of enlisting on a directory for their chosen specialties.
They need to differentiate between one type of lawyer directory and another.
Some directories like Avvo.com are free, while others like LawTally.com are not.
Some provide you the advantage of ranking higher on search engines, while others do not.
Here are some essential advantages.
Provides opportunities for collaboration.
Enlisting on a legal directory provides many opportunities for collaborating with experienced attorneys.
With increasingly diverging specialties, there is a need to access a pool of experts.
According to Berbay Marketing & PR, some directories create profiles for lawyers before they know about it.
Such lawyers can also claim their profiles and get good ratings.
When listed, site researchers and reviewers categorize them based on recommendations and reviews.
Similarly, this categorization makes it possible for blocs of lawyers to interact and share resources besides the many reports and analyses that those sites make available to them.
Higher visibility to clients.
This is by far the most crucial use of legal directory submission.
The study says 2/3 of consumers are more likely to hire lawyers with online reviews.
According to a 2016 study by FindLaw.com puts the figure at 98% in 2019 for all inquiries that hit the internet.
It is not new that legal directories rank impressively on Google and other search engines.
Besides, this practice is laden with lots of legal SEO practices.
Thus, it is imperative to identify the correct directory for your law firm.
This article will take care of this process.
Higher ranking of your website on search engines.
Besides making your firm more visible, high-ranking law directories can also make your website rank.
By creating a backlink to your website, you can benefit from their domain authority.
Neil Patel inputs that the number of backlinks and the domain score of any website are solid factors for ranking them.
Thus, you are on your way to page one with a backlink from a website with a great score.
This would inevitably increase your market share and turnover.
Gaining an impressive reputation.
Most lawyer directories allow clients the opportunity to leave reviews and make recommendations.
Responding to reviews and making improvements based on feedback builds reputation, according to TrustPilot.
If the website has a provision for reviewing services, there is every chance that website visitors can also see them.
Hence, there are chances that you can gain a beneficial reputation.
Improves case-specific searches.
In addition to local SEO rankings, search algorithms present lawyers and firms by their specialty and referral credit.
Lawyer directories provide a massive advantage in this regard.
According to Rock Pilots, the directory ensures that you have a “leg up” on local competitors.
Using Alexa ranking metrics and Domain Authority, the following lawyer directories have the highest search and ranking potential. The list also includes fast-rising law directories.
S/N | Directory | DA | Backlinks | Keywords |
1 | Justia | 89 | 5,428 | 274.3k |
2 | LegalZoom | 68 | 1,176 | 176.6k |
3 | FindLaw | 82 | 12,611 | 316.5k |
4 | Avvo | 68 | 3,411 | 236.1k |
5 | LawTally | 58 | 3,211 | 108.5k |
6 | NOLO | 61 | 3,462 | 247.8k |
7 | RocketLawyer | 65 | 447 | 97.7k |
8 | UpCounsel | 64 | 116 | 122.3k |
9 | Lawyers.com | 68 | 2,473 | 138.5k |
10 | AllLaw | 59 | 671 | 112.8k |
11 | Martindale-Hubbell | 64 | 3,649 | 80.5k |
12 | Super Lawyers | 60 | 2,531 | 93.1k |
13 | LegalMatch | 61 | 590 | 129.4k |
14 | LawInfo | 56 | 603 | 122.3k |
15 | Best Lawyers | 51 | 521 | 64.3k |
16 | Lawyer Legion | 37 | 104 | 44.8k |
17 | Lawyer.com | 54 | 375 | 62.8k |
18 | Legal Directories | 45 | 225 | 68.1k |
19 | HG.org | 64 | 1,211 | 142.3k |
20 | LawGuru | 53 | 700 | 14.5k |
NB: Analysis as of Tuesday, May 25, 2021
Online lawyer directories or legal directories represent the widespread application of internet tools in various industries.
Legal directories have been in existence long before this time.
However, with the explosion of the internet, every profession and sector has been linked to it in a way or two.
We can identify the following advantages:
The broad spectrum of legal services.
Developers of legal directories organize them using such parameters as a specialty, location, and many others.
Overtly, this has made it very possible for enquirers to access a wide array of legal services.
This implies pulling out of the rat race for an attorney.
Yes, a general tag need not define you.
While some attorneys would be available for hire almost immediately, others would benefit from offering rare services.
Credit advantage.
Lawyers that have enlisted in legal directories have the advantage of getting reviews.
Credibility sites like Trustpilot provide users the opportunity to post reviews about websites.
Besides, most online directories like Amazon thrive on reviews.
This is also an essential feature of legal directories.
The law firms that enlist on legal directories also have their reviews and testimonies.
Together, these review features enable lawyers to earn credit as they work.
These advantages also make them more marketable-worthy.
Faster provision of services.
Like eCommerce, legal directories remove the distance barrier between lawyers and their prospective clients.
Within minutes, an individual seeking legal service can identify the right attorney for themselves.
This makes it very convenient and worth engaging with.
The process of identifying a profitable legal directory requires understanding the objectives of such sites as well as their ranking potential.
One also has to know the cost of enrolment.
Generally, the greater the benefits, the greater the cost.
A closer look at legal directories will reveal that each directory has its characteristics and opportunities.
Here, we shall examine their characteristics.
After that, we shall examine opportunities available with different lawyer directories.
Finally, we shall explain how you can take advantage of these opportunities when choosing.
Lawyer directories, like other directories, index links.
Howbeit, they are specifically for legal purposes.
Hence, most site visitors reach these sites intending to hire lawyers or get legal services.
Since there are many options, attorneys have the challenge of making decisions.
Since we want to help you identify the directory that suits you, we offer the following steps:
Define your purpose.
Most legal directories are in a rat race for higher rankings on Google.
After all, higher placement determines higher traffic.
Others are in for the money and some for the quality.
Hence, you need to know what you need before you consider enlisting.
The list above highlights directories by their Alexa ranking.
Alexa provides an up-to-date ranking of different websites based on variable metrics.
We listed some of these factors alongside.
Generally, higher-ranking websites generate higher traffic and have higher domain authority.
A high-ranking website enables you to get higher visibility.
However, if you search for a more practice-specific website for your law firm, you might need to look for various factors.
We shall provide some in this post.
Check your budget.
Enlisting on Justia is complimentary, while Avvo offers free and paid options.
Both websites have impressive listings.
However, Paid and free versions do not always return the same value for your law firm.
Hence, you must consider the returns on your payment.
Is it worth paying for?
Can you enlist without receiving premium packages only available to paid firms and attorneys?
The option is yours to make.
Identify the services offered.
LawGuru offers an opportunity for people to ask questions and get answers from lawyers.
LawTally is in the business of identifying lawyers by their location, practice, and reputation.
Justia features thousands of informative articles, among others.
This shows us lawyer directories are not just about creating links to law firms.
Some provide case studies.
Others provide diverse opportunities to grow.
Whatever the objective, it is vital that you glance through the services before signing up.
Be sure it would be beneficial to you.
As stated earlier, online visibility is a vital benefit of legal directories.
Like it or not, more persons interact with the internet today.
Most of these persons search for the best possible attorney they can get.
Except they have specific attorneys they want to engage, enquirers often look for credibility.
Directories offer that opportunity for such enquirers to know the best lawyers by their specialties.
Often, they search by keywords or anything that allows them to relate to the search.
Remember that some persons are not as obsessed with the internet as you are.
Understand these persons and put yourself in their shoes.
What would you do if you needed a lawyer? You hit the internet.
The search bar pops up, and you are about to type in a bunch of words to locate the right attorney.
After you type, Google displays some links for you with thousands, or millions, of others.
You do not want to waste your time browsing through all that stuff.
You just need to locate an impressive lawyer with a record of accomplishment.
Maybe they are not very familiar with the metrics or algorithms.
Google, or any other search engine, is not into telling you all of that.
However, we are confident that SEO counts greatly in determining market share and patronage.
Mr. Adams is looking for an intellectual property attorney in the US.
He keys his search terms into the input bar and gets this:
Google Ads For Law Firm
Underneath the ads, you find the following: You always get some sponsored listings showing at the top of your results.
This is normal.
Perhaps, this does not guarantee a hire.
Organic Results
According to Inc., about 91% of web searchers do not really trust them. Hence, they should be little of a problem. That is except Mr. Adams turns out to be part of the other 9%.
You will realize that it has a mix of law firm websites and legal directories.
The specific law firms create these websites for their team of lawyers.
Ranking this high on search engines requires getting excellent offerings with your legal portfolio.
However, you can achieve this feat by enlisting in a legal directory.
It is essential to consider your pocket and consistency of income when enlisting in a lawyer directory.
Do this with an understanding of the possible impact on your future endeavors.
For clarification, most lawyer directories are scraper sites.
According to enterprise reviewer and analyst Sean Doherty, you do not require authorization to create an account for yourself.
This can be a hurdle in itself or may not be at all.
However, the work that remains on such cases is to go ahead and claim your profile.
The profile-claiming process can be accessible for some and not for others.
Due to the operating system of such websites, Sean Doherty inputs that the sites create the legal services as packages and tag the lawyers that provide the services.
Clients identify the particular service they want and select the lawyer who provides them.
The lawyer receives payment when the client pays to the site after the service.
The site later pays the lawyer at given times or automatically.
In most instances, the lawyers can withdraw from the site anytime.
These practices have helped many free legal directories stay in business throughout the internet’s history.
If you consider enlisting with a free legal directory, Trial Law proposes the following:
Free directories
S/N | Legal directory | Domain Authority | Linking root domains | Ranking keywords |
1 | Justia | 89 | 91.1k | 1.4m |
2 | Avvo | 68 | 46.7k | 705.2k |
3 | HG | 64 | 18.1k | 257.9k |
4 | Best Lawyers | 51 | 8.9k | 49.8k |
5 | US Legal | 67 | 16.9k | 90.9k |
6 | Lawyer Legion | 37 | 2.5k | 40.8k |
7 | Law Guru | 53 | 5.9k | 1k |
8 | Law Link | 48 | 4.4k | 10.8k |
9 | Just Great lawyers | 35 | 2.9k | 9.2k |
10 | Public legal | 52 | 4.8k | 28.6k |
We collected the data above through the Moz domain analysis tool on June 12, 2021.
The legal directories listed above show properties of legal directories that you should look out for before you embark on the sign-up process. We explain these items and their advantages in detail below.
Moz developed the Domain Authority score to assess a website’s ranking strength quickly.
It employs a couple of factors to arrive at this score.
The most viable of these factors are the linking root domains and keywords.
Domain Authority has a scale of 1 to 100, with 100 showing a higher ranking potential.
Side by side domain analysis
Lawyer Legion and US Legal side by side, and US Legal have about 16,900 linking root domains while Lawyer Legion has about 2,500.
This implies that US Legal has more other pages linking to it across the internet.
We can assess the authority of a website through the amount of traffic it gets from other sites and search engines. Consider the following:
When you want to tell if you are correct on a particular arithmetic exercise, you want to check the answer of the top student in the class.
This cements the place of the top student in arithmetic.
Similarly, you can tell that more websites consider US Legal as an excellent reference for their topics.
Pacelab identifies linking root domains as a vital factor for Google algorithms and guides clients with specific search terms.
Moz identifies ranking keywords as those keywords for which a website ranks well.
Considering that you are an insurance attorney, your natural inclination would be to register on a directory that easily ranks well for insurance keywords.
The Moz analysis tool provides the main ranking keywords for websites.
Hence, it is ideal to consider these before signing up with a free legal directory.
Compared to free directory listings, a paid lawyer directory is somewhat straightforward in charges and subscription fees for enlisted lawyers.
S/N | Legal directory | Domain Authority | Linking root domains | Ranking keywords |
1 | Lawyer.com | 55 | 6.4k | 120.8k |
2 | Super Lawyers | 60 | 21.4k | 244k |
3 | Law Info | 56 | 8k | 110.6k |
4 | Lawyers.com | 68 | 34.2k | 278.4k |
5 | NOLO | 71 | 50.5k | 682.5k |
6 | FindLaw | 82 | 127.5k | 1.1m |
7 | LawTally | 59 | 1.2k | 3.6k |
8 | Mediate.com | 60 | 9k | 19.8k |
9 | Enjuris | 42 | 1.6k | 38.1k |
10 | Jurist | 64 | 11k | 14.5k |
NB: Information correct as of June 13, 2021.
In addition to the many benefits of free directories, paid directories provide many other advantages that make them stand out from the free ones.
However, the extent to which they are beneficial is a crucial factor to consider before you claim your profile or register afresh.
Tara Bailey highlighted some factors that make paid directories somewhat unique. We explain them below:
Both free and paid directories require some form of financing to keep running.
Hence, a traditional means of income is required.
According to Frank Olivo of Sagapixel, a legal website can cost up to $80,000 to design.
Besides other running costs that run into thousands of dollars every month, this is true.
Due to this setup, legal directories must have some sort of regular income – whether they be paid or free.
With free directories, adverts and other promotional activities can benefit from sponsoring these.
Due to this, listed lawyers do not have complete control of their accounts.
As a result, some directories provide free and paid listings to enable the lawyers to control their accounts when they upgrade to the paid packages.
Avvo does this.
However, you easily avoid this fundamental problem for completely paid directories as you have complete control of your account from the very start.
Legal directories provide more than accessibility.
They hire the services of SEO experts that boost the visibility of the directory online.
Tara Bailey observed that these directories appear above individual legal firm websites on the search engine results page (SERP).
Whether you have a personal website or corporate website, a paid legal directory ensures that you are right where your clients will find you – at the top of search results.
Free directories require lawyers to make an extra payment to access these perks.
Further research shows that your profile benefits relatively from the many backlinks that contribute to the website’s authority.
According to Relevance, one of the ways to get higher returns on investment is to increase everything.
One of these is the financial commitment you make.
As a matter of duty, the managers of paid legal directories give their best to create better visibility for their clients.
In some instances, you need to pay more to get more services.
In general, these provisions create more opportunities for conversion.
To get the advantages of a paid legal directory, you need to closely analyze them for their features.
A popular and reliable way to get this information is to carry out a quick analysis on Moz.
Nolo is a high-ranking paid legal directory.
Nolo.com Domain Analysis
DA of 71 shows that it has a chance of ranking better than many other websites.
DA shows that would outrank Mediate.com and Super Lawyers.
Similarly, LawTally would help us understand a relationship here.
Free Domain Analysis LawTally
LawTally has a lower number of linking root domains and ranking keywords compared to Enjuris. However, it has a more favorable domain authority.
This is the strength of the linking domains and other advanced metrics like competitor sites on main keywords.
Given this relationship, you can look closer for other factors like what we show below.
Nolo KW Volume
The tables above show the visibility of Nolo for the given keywords.
Hence, you would rank better for defamation according to this information provided.
Consider the information for Super Lawyers below:
Keyword Analysis Super Lawyer
It shows a current trend for the “age of consent.” A paid analysis with the assistance of an experienced SEO expert would provide more information on the most-ranking keywords.
If you want to have a higher ROI, identifying the directory that ranks better for keywords that concern you is the appropriate step to take.
The best legal directories put much effort into quality.
You can identify quality in various ways.
However, making legal directories makes some directories different from others.
Considering the list compiled above, the following criteria are noteworthy.
Alexa ranking measures websites based on the average number of page visits they receive over the last three months.
Though independent of search analysis, Alexa is an authority for grading the power of any website.
To enlist in an active website, it is ideal to consider a high-ranking legal directory.
The higher the Alexa ranking, the greater the traffic that it gets.
This will also give you a higher chance of engagement and business.
To know a site’s Alexa ranking, simply visit here and analyze the prospective legal directory address.
Alexa Ranking
Alexa will return a set of metrics, including the site’s ranking. It also shows you how the site has fared in the last three months and the countries with the highest search.
For example, an analysis of Justia will return the following score.
Alexa 90 Days Trend For Justia
Justia ranks 3,595 on global internet engagement at the search time.
It also shows the 90-day trend of the website.
As may be seen, the website has been increasing over the 90-days report period.
See the 90-day trend report in the image below.
Alexa 90 Days Reports For Justia
This report puts the figure at 803.
The trend shows that the site has moved impressively in the last three months.
Thus, enlisting in Justia would be a good idea.
Alexa also shows how a site ranks in different countries.
This ranking might be beneficial for identifying your chances of success in your target market.
While an international lawyer might be very concerned about the global rankings, regional lawyers also look out for specific country rankings. See below:
Country Ranking
According to this report, the site ranks 957 in the US and 623 in Mexico.
This ranking is impressive for a law directory.
Lawyers that want to get clients from these countries can quickly enlist here.
Knowing competitor sites’ ranking helps you better understand alternatives or assess your possible advantage.
Alexa shows how different legal directories compare or overlap in the audience.
Consider the analysis on FindLaw below:
This report shows that Avvo, Justia, and Nolo share much in common with FindLaw.
Thus, one can easily choose between these alternatives and get a decent clientele.
Except for the cost of signing up, these sites would share very similar traits.
Alexa also highlights how the site you are analyzing fares in its audience share.
FindLaw gets about 78.9% of the audience searching for information common to FindLaw, Avvo, Justia, Nolo, and LawTally.
These persons might be lawyers using the site.
However, the main targets are clients looking for an attorney online.
The comparative average shows the average visits to similar sites.
Thus, we can see here that FindLaw has an impressive following for people searching for legal directories.
Another way to select a legal directory is by traffic-related to relevant keywords.
As stated earlier, most enquirers use keywords when conducting queries.
Alexa shows the percentage of keywords that drive traffic to a particular website.
This would show if enlisting on the directory would drive more traffic your way under that keyword.
See for example:
Top Keywords
More than 50% of persons searching for “durable power of attorney” would click on Nolo.
This is not the same with “trademark search” or “Florida unemployment.”
Website authority is a significant standard to consider before selecting a legal directory.
Ahrefs has a tool for measuring this factor.
Website Authority checker Ahref
You can run the analysis for your chosen legal directory by typing the address into the bar.
If the address is active, it returns the website’s domain rating on a scale of 100.
These metrics, though independent, have substantial implications for the ranking potential of the said website.
We ran an analysis on Avvo.com and got the following report:
Domain Ratings for Avvo
A domain rating of 90% is impressive.
This means that enlisting on this site will increase your chances of ranking higher on search engines.
It can also pull this traffic to your website and other associated pages.
How do we know that this score is suitable?
The rating is excellent in the first place.
If that were a standard to go by, we would comfortably say that Avvo stands somewhere in the top 10% of websites.
That would mean the top 10% of legal directories.
Furthermore, we can infer from this metric that enlisting would draw you close to the top of page one of any search engine.
As may be seen from the report above, dofollow links play an immense role in the position of a legal directory.
Avvo has about 7 million links to it.
About 66% of these are dofollow links.
These links determine the amount of organic traffic that can reach this site.
Hence, it has a high ranking.
Similarly, the report shows that about 47,000 different websites link to this website.
That is a massive pull of legal business for lawyers signed up.
However, this could come at a cost.
Dofollow links are links on web pages that search engines can follow to reach a destination page.
In this case, Avvo has a bunch of such links.
It shows that it can have lots of engagement.
Suppose you sign up for a legal directory with many dofollow links.
The site will naturally draw web traffic to you.
This will also result in higher client engagement and more hires.
That is what a good domain rating (DR) can do for you.
Look out for this attribute before enlisting.
Let us say you specialize in a particular legal practice domain and get specific traffic on that count.
You would have to find a legal directory that speaks your language.
Many legal directories have this attribute.
Look at LawTally, for example.
LawTally by Practice Area
It features diverse categories of lawyers.
Each category has tens, hundreds, or even thousands of lawyers.
Signing up for this directory would mean easy navigation around the site and quick identification of an ideal attorney.
Most other sites offer this kind of categorization—Howbeit, in different formats.
Ensure you know about these arrangements before you sign up.
We see that categorized sites also provide many other benefits on a closer look.
In the administrative lawyer section of LawTally, you can find this:
Lawyer Listings
This shows us how much some sites put into creating relevant portfolios for their clients.
On a similar site like SuperLawyers, enquirers can easily key in the kind of lawyer they want.
They can type in the name or the legal issue type.
They can also type in the preferred location of the lawyer.
Furthermore, SuperLawyers also allows the accessible location of law firms by its search feature.
Law Firm Search
Legal directories like this are easily navigable. At the snap of a finger, you can be located.
Thus, it is best to try checking out such sites.
A legal directory without a local search feature would be difficult to identify a prospective lawyer.
Except, of course, it is not necessary.
Most of the legal directories identified in our list make this feature available for lawyers and clients.
Primarily, this makes it very convenient to conduct well-directed searches.
The convenience serves both lawyers, clients, and researchers.
In most cases, legal directories have a location field where users can type in the primary location of the lawyer.
For directories serving international purposes, this feature is more elaborate.
It also allows users to work within specific provisions.
This recognizes that various regions and states are run by different laws most of the time.
Similarly, some industries have different versions of the law in other areas.
The location feature quickly makes the identification of an ideal lawyer straightforward.
A well-diversified legal directory ensures that all search queries can receive directions to their answers.
The top legal directories are hosts of relevant legal content besides lawyer information.
This is a vital factor in identifying a profitable lawyer directory.
The best legal directories often feature hundreds and, sometimes, thousands of legal articles.
Such articles would range from the outcomes of legal processes to other vital information for the law domain.
Take Justia’s marketing blog, for example.
It features lots of helpful information for both lawyers and clients.
It also has testimonies from clients and professional information for lawyers who want to diversify or try some intricate subjects.
This legal marketing and technology blog has been running since 2005.
They update these blogs several times every month.
Justia Marketing
The amount of information that traverses a legal directory shows, primarily, how helpful it is to its visitors.
Hence, looking out for this feature is necessary.
Similarly, contributing blog posts to a legal directory helps an attorney follow.
It aids visibility and trust.
In most cases, blog posts show how knowledgeable or experienced an attorney is in certain legal matters.
They also allow users to engage with these lawyers by asking questions and sharing experiences.
Alexa shows how these blogs make different legal articles rank side-by-side on vital keywords.
See the image below for an example.
Popular Articles
It shows popular articles for FindLaw.
However, as the description shows, it does not only show the result for FindLaw.
It also shows other websites that share the same audience.
Here we see a couple of articles with Justia.
This implies that Justia has a more significant engagement for the types of articles that would drive people to FindLaw (put straight).
Put differently, the amount of engagement that a legal directory enjoys is a function of the Relevance of its content.
Quality content drives many people to sites.
Not many people want to dive straight into business.
A couple of persons would like to check a few spots and determine if the lawyers are worth working with after all.
Some persons remain on-site more than others do.
LawGuru knows this, and that is why it offers an interactive platform.
A couple of other legal directories do the same.
However, the practice at LawGuru is remarkable.
Check out their page below.
LawGuru
They know that “Customer is king” and work accordingly.
Consider the setup.
LawGuru dedicates about 80% of its homepage to addressing customer inquiries.
A practice like this can make many clients appreciate their interests and act accordingly.
There are also ready-made questions and answers.
It creates an environment that is similar to a legal forum.
We know that legal questions are endless.
However, providing clients the opportunity to understand the legal environment makes hiring easier.
It is like having access to an encyclopedia of law.
The kinds of services that a lawyer directory lists will determine its lawyers’ patronage.
This is besides the different industries and specialties.
Justia offers pro bono services besides many other legal services.
This might be an excellent deal for lawyers with a passion for the poor or helpless.
If you are a humanitarian lawyer, you might have to look up a directory with a cause other than allowing clients to hire attorneys for themselves.
AllLaw provides robust settlement and payment calculators that allow users to arrive at due figures quickly.
It also provides a consultation channel, as do many other legal directories.
AllLaw also offers other resources besides its hypothetic legal calculator.
It has some legal books, forms, and software on-site.
These are just a few of the many kinds of services legal directories offer to clients.
Since lawyers provide these services in practice, you must look for them and determine if they suit your goals and specialty.
We take you to Alexa again to see some crucial metrics – visitor engagement.
Like it or not, directories are created for visitors.
These visitors may be attorneys or clients.
Whichever way, we know that a bulk of those persons are clients.
If this is true, then we can be sure of business.
Otherwise, the site is only making unnecessary noise.
In this regard, Alexa provides some key metrics.
Site Metrix
The report above is for FindLaw.
As may be seen, site visitors engage mildly with the site.
On average, individual visitors view the site 1.61 times.
This would imply that more persons who reach the site view more than one page on average.
This would mean that related to its Alexa ranking, and users probably have specific pages they visit before leaving the site.
It also reports that the average time spent on the site is somewhere around 2 minutes.
This shows a fall from the previous reporting period (of 90 days).
Furthermore, the report shows that 74.8% of the site visits are to just one page.
It means that a more significant number of persons check out only one of the site’s pages.
As we can see, this is a fall from the previous 90-day report.
The fall implies that more persons now check out other pages besides the initial page visited.
These website metrics indicate the trend of the interaction of visitors with the site.
Before enlisting on any legal directory, be sure to study the trend of visits and engagement with the site over a given period.
Alexa has provided reports for the past 90 days.
This is adequate.
Alexa also shows traffic-generating channels.
Free analyses return search traffic, while paid analyses also return referral, social, and direct traffic.
Traffic Score
The report shows that about 79% of the traffic to this site comes from search results.
The analysis reveals that these include organic and paid searches.
The report also revealed that much of the traffic followed Google and other search engines.
This would inform us that most site visitors reached the site through a search engine other than a social media click or referral.
Trustpilot is an online resource for identifying a credible legal directory.
Before you enlist on a legal directory, you should run an analysis on it at Trustpilot.
The parameters to look out for include the number of reviews sent and the average rating.
We ran an analysis on LegalZoom; a Consumer-centric legal platform, and Trustpilot returned the following report:
Legal Zoom TrustPilot Rating
As we can see, it has a report of 2.0 on average from 156 reviews.
Trustpilot also allows site owners to claim their sites and respond to negative reviews.
Similarly, Trustpilot also provides contact information and other details about the website reviewed.
Negative Reviews
Trustpilot is independent of rankings and other metrics.
However, it can help to tell a thing or two about any website.
Be sure to read the reviews and responses before you conclude. Good luck with that.
This post has shed light on the main areas to consider before enlisting in a legal directory.
Howbeit, here are some questions some attorneys frequently ask before enlisting.
We also provide some well-researched answers to them.
No, it is not. Enlisting in an online legal directory is a choice you have to make.
Make an informed decision before making conclusions.
We provided a list of essential considerations to make before making a decision.
If, after your considerations, it does not turn out to be necessary, you might not bother doing so.
However, enlisting on a legal directory is necessary if you need more visits to your page and increased patronage.
Yes and No. the bulk of legal directories are free to use.
Some have a mixture of free and paid sign-ups.
A few are paid directories.
However, the cost is never a challenge anywhere in signing up for a legal directory.
Among the top free legal directories are Justia and Best Lawyers.
HG.org charges around $195/year while Nolo pegs its fee at $1125/year, while LawTally costs merely a cup of coffee.
Paid legal directories provide some unique resources to their lawyers and firms.
Besides, directories that have both versions – like Avvo set some limits for free sign-ups.
Hence, it might be best to consider the kind of services you wish to get as a member.
Also, know if your package would allow you to make the most of your services as a lawyer.
Yes and No.
One can not ignore the importance of increased visibility on the internet nowadays.
This post dedicated about 65% of its content to helping you enlist on a high-ranking legal directory.
This approach is intentional.
According to WebFX, only about 25% of users scroll past page one.
This figure gets lower and lower for subsequent pages.
Besides, not many persons look past those sites ranking higher on page one.
Organic search drives more than 50% of traffic to any site.
Page ranking plays a significant role in making legal practice a success.
On the other hand, if you do not find it a requirement, you might just miss the visibility.
Enlisting in a legal directory directly improves your legal portfolio.
It directly makes your website rank higher by passing a link juice and web page authority.
As you may have known by now, different websites benefit from each other through backlinks and referrals.
With a typical legal directory, there are tons of backlinks and referrals.
These backlinks pass some value to the websites that they enlist.
This value from high-ranking sites is “link juice” in colloquial terms.
With authoritative backlinks, websites get higher appeal to Google and other search engines.
This implies that if your website or social media profile is on a high-ranking legal directory, the site passes some of its value to your page.
You are practically rubbing shoulders with the “big boys.”
These benefits often come at no cost for most of these websites.
Yes, this is normal. It is common practice for legal directories to enlist lawyers without their knowledge.
This practice is not limited to legal directories.
It allows the directory admin to grow their reach and helps lawyers be visible online.
To claim your profile, simply follow the links to claim your profile.
You can ignore it too.
Remember to look out for marketing opportunities for your profile.
These efforts offer you some degree of exposure and ensure that you are reachable to the people that matter to you.
Defaulters.com is an anonymous platform, that allows its users to submit complaints and reviews against companies and individuals.
Any post submitted on Defaulters.com often makes it to the top of Google search pages.
This article will provide an accurate list of procedures for taking down posts from Defaulters.com
First, let us tell you about Defaulters.com.
“Any truth is better than indefinite doubt.” You will find this statement on the introductory page of Defaulters.
The site claims to be an avenue for customers to vent their displeasure and dissatisfaction with the services of companies and individuals.
The site also allows visitors to comment on the posts submitted and leave their reviews.
Though the site claims excellent and bad reviews for good reviews, many comments promote negative reviews.
This approach is similar to that of ComplaintsBoard.com, ScamPulse.com, and RepDigger.com.
Sadly, this can be detrimental to businesses listed on it. It also spells doom for reputable individuals that find themselves in its pages.
The website also says that its site serves as a complaint aggregator. It is accurate as it has thousands of complaints against various businesses.
Unfortunately, many reports against the site show that it targets doctors.
They also claim that the site hires writers to post negative reviews to extort upwards of $1,500 for removal.
And the website owner claims that it serves as a function of social awareness.
With its advert page featuring prices ranging from $500 to $1500 per month, it is fair to say that it also leverages its traffic for advert purposes.
However, as you may find on the site, it does not appear to enjoy much patronage in advertorials.
It is due to its stigma, highlighting negative over-optimistic.
If a business is featured on the site, the chances are that visitors would easily consider it a partner with hate.
Social awareness also serves to make people know the unprofessional practices of some businesses and individuals.
And the site also provides a medium where users can compile and share information about various entities.
Unfortunately, this would ruin their reputation rather than increase their customer appeal.
The site structure also allows users to submit reviews under a given subject.
These would create higher agreement on the claims against the subject leading to more business losses.
Unfortunately, the site policy states that it is not under obligation to respond to emails from anyone.
Thus, its practices have led to more significant losses for businesses rather than protecting customers.
More often than not, site users complain of Defaulters.com being a scam site than being advantageous to anyone.
Defaulters.com also claims it serves to educate customers about businesses and individuals.
That keeps them updated and makes informed decisions when doing business or shifting providers.
Furthermore, the site provides some resources about trends in the market and other forms of consumer education. These featured articles often fall short of their purpose.
Most of them are expert reviews about businesses and schemes gone wrong. A team of writers hired by the website provides most of these articles.
Get your content deleted from Defaulters.com by filling out the below form.
Defaulters.com has an uncanny advantage of ranking in Google’s first three links on searches. Its programs seem to crack Google’s algorithms with relative flair.
This structure seems to keep it at a relative advantage that offers good traffic.
While most business and person’s review sites have unique features, they show some craft level in their system.
That might be due to its length of experience in the system since its commissioning in the late ’90s.
The website provides extensive information to its users. It provides these pieces of information on its terms of services page.
The format and procedure are similar to those used by TheDirty.com.
The site outlines its non-removal policy, privacy policy, terms of services, litigation, and threats.
This way, it provides every necessary information on what site users should know before using the site.
It also spells out every necessary information on how people should remove information from its pages.
The dedicated page on the website was created to educate consumers. Though not exceptional in this regard, they portray themselves as concerned about site visitors’ all-around enlightenment.
Users would likely spend time reading other articles besides negative reviews about brands and individuals.
In contrast, sites like RipOfReport.com do not provide much information on these matters.
It is uncommon to find sites that create news and updates and bad business news like the website does.
It states that it serves both consumers and business owners on a lighter note.
By posting their grievances complaints, customers can let go of their worries.
On the other hand, it states that entrepreneurs can better serve their clients by having their businesses mentioned on the site and growing their client base.
Unfortunately, very few site users speak well of the site to achieve this goal. It has contributed to the fall of businesses and hardly helped any improvement.
Suppose any business venture has any plans to keep its market share. It cannot afford to have its profile.
The site has an impressive following.
Once listed, it isn’t easy to maintain the same business patronage and market share.
This is why you must remove your name as soon as possible.
Remove Reports understands the system used by Defaulters.com
This is one reason you should contact us on time to remove your data from Defaulters.com
Read More: How To Get Yourself Removed From Letmeexpose.com
“More business is lost every year through neglect than through any other cause.” This statement adorns the About page of the website.
The site, like other sites, has a strong connection with listing businesses of various sorts.
Many standard practices and goals are familiar to them.
Firstly, they do not allow the removal of posts by the author or the reported party.
Once the posting is completed, the author waives the rights to the posted content to Defaulters.com.
Regardless of the magnitude or implications of the post, removal will be almost impossible.
They do not also allow authors to edit posts they have already submitted.
RipOffReport.com allows affected parties to post a rebuttal under the same post.
ComplaintsBoard.com also allows comments.
While the website allows the author to edit the post, they also advise if there is a change in the report’s status.
ComplaintsBoard.com has a provision for authors and the affected party to resolve the issue on the site, after which they would change its status to “resolved.”
However, they inform that the admin will review the edits before posting them.
Similarly, the website does not review the authenticity of the information in posts before publishing.
This is the same with other similar sites.
A few like ComplaintsBoard.com would allow about a day or two to review the post before publishing it. Further, it states that it does not check for such details.
However, as with sites like TheDirty.com, Defaulters.com reveals that it would review the contents of a post and possibly delete some sections or take it down entirely if compelled by law.
The law makes provisions for actions such as this and is enforceable.
In addition, it isn’t easy to take down posts from the website.
This is the same with other complaints sites.
The process of taking down posts is quite demanding. It is also expensive in some instances.
Though the site does not mention it, users have complained that the site admins have requested them to pay $1,500 to take down content against them.
Though speculative, it might cost the same as going through the legal route.
Due to the site’s legal protection advises all aggrieved persons to engage experienced lawyers and approach the court.
It’s the main procedure for taking down posts.
However, the website reveals that it is not obligated to respond to all requests. Besides, it states that it would not respond to some posts.
Hence it indicates that taking down posts or other information from the website might be possible but not specific.
This is an excellent reason to seek a more definite measure to take down posts.
Below we will show you, in clear points, how you can take down posts. We would also show you alternative routes that guarantee you a successful post removal from Defaulters.com.
Do you also know that you can take down a post without contacting the website admin? You can apply that if you cannot follow their procedure.
We are sure that you will identify a specific route by reading this article.
An individual must be at least 14 years old to submit a complaint on Defaulters. They also need to have a valid email address.
Submitting a complaint is relatively straightforward. However, the website advises that the poster read its terms of service and privacy policy.
The terms of services make clear statements on the proper ethics in posting on the site. It advises the following:
Similarly, they highlight specific information that it prohibits from the site. In this regard, it provides the following directives:
Adequate knowledge of these terms would enable anyone to sue for removal effectively.
The difficulty is that such a move would not guarantee removal.
However, we can show you how to take advantage of these titbits to take your information from the website.
The posting process requires submitting all details about the individual or company that one is reporting.
The reporter also has to submit their information – name and email address. They also have the option to post in anonymity.
After submitting a report for publishing, the author waives all rights to Defaulters.com.
This waiver does not imply that the website is responsible for the post. However, Defaulters.com would be able to work with the report. It also has the right to manage all the report’s author data.
Read More: How To Delete Content From ScamPulse.com
Defaulters.com has a similar manner of approach as scamion.com. When an individual or business reviews it, site visitors regard it as fraudulent.
Regardless of the number of stars they earn or the number of reviews, the outcome is often the same.
That is why it is essential to cut off any associations with the site.
According to a Forbes review by Chad Otar, about 93% of consumers read reviews before deciding which businesses to patronize.
Furthermore, about 94% would avoid a business if they found negative reviews about it.
Similarly, another review by Jesse McCambridge on CMG Local Solutions reveals that poor reviews are detrimental to the success of businesses.
The outcomes include up to 33% less revenue for every star lost, about 50% loss of reputation, 22% loss of customers per star, lower search engine rankings, and less profitability.
An employee stands to lose jobs, is hiring potential, and faces bullying. See the statistics here.
You cannot ask a post author to remove a report from the website. It is not possible. The terms of service took away that right from them when they submitted the post.
Similarly, the website would not respond to a plea from an affected person to remove a post. It isn’t easy to draw their attention to a lawyer or court order.
According to its statements on its site, it also receives hundreds of requests from affected businesses and individuals.
Therefore, it states that contacting them to remove a post is not a guaranteed procedure.
That notwithstanding, we can be able to get their attention. How do we go about this? Read on.
The law provides the security that it has. Thus, it is best to do so via a legal route to access them. Nevertheless, one must hire a lawyer with satisfactory experience in internet law. Doing otherwise would cause unnecessary losses.
However, if you happen to find content breaches on your rights, you may go to court. When doing so, do not entangle in the process.
Doing so may make it difficult to progress with their cooperation. They may even take up legal action against you. Do not try that approach.
Contacting the court is necessary if you find copyright content belonging to you or a partner on the site.
You may evoke the DMCA and be able to get the content removed.
To remove copyright content, The site requests that you send a DMCA notice with the following:
You are to send the DMCA notice to [email protected]
If a user posted false or defamatory information, the affected person might take legal action against them as provided by the law.
In this case, they may approach Defaulters with a subpoena to provide the details of the post author.
Due to this fact, the site advises its users to post content that would not incriminate them as they (Defaulters) will not hesitate to provide their information if they are found wanting.
Defaulters also accept requests to remove content from California residents who posted the content while less than 18 years.
In sending such a request, the sender should attach the subject, “California Online Eraser,” and send it to the email above.
When the content posted on the site violates the website’s terms of service, you may draw their attention to the post.
Since they do not review content before publishing, people submit lots of content that infringe on their terms.
When you draw their attention to such content, They review it and take it down if it violates their terms.
This is a reliable way to remove content.
The reviews about the site agree with this. However, they may not review it. If they do, they may not consider it a priority.
Defaulters.com would have been a straightforward site to relate with if one could access them and submit subpoenas, notices, and requests.
However, they are not.
The site reveals that it reserves the right to follow through on such requests. Thus, your claim may be proper, but they would not respond to it.
The admins claim that this is due to the many requests they receive.
This shows that despite the efforts people will put into removing their content, they might ignore them.
When removing a post from Defaulters.com becomes a challenge, you might approach Google with a subpoena.
If you could prove that the content is false or illegal, and the court grants your request, Google would oblige.
Google can take down the page URL from its library.
That implies that it would not pop up in Google search.
If reaching Google becomes difficult, or if the court does not grant your request, you can still be able to remove your pages from showing up in search engines.
See our article on removing your page URL from Google.
If you want to remove content from Defaulters.com, nothing can stop you from contacting Remove Reports to do it for you. We have adequate experience in removing content from websites alike.
Get your content deleted by filling out the below form.
We have a record of excellent service, offer you a lifetime guaranteed service, and only receive complete payment after we have done a satisfactory removal for you.
1629 K Street NW #300
Washington, DC 20006
123-12 Jamaica Ave, RH
New York, 11418
We are focused towards making all the bad content go away from the web. We will remove the negative content, fake ratings and reviews and anything that violates your credibility.
© 2020 — RemoveReports.com. All Rights Reserved.